Romero AJF, Ramos LJC, Rivera VP, Álvarez JG, Molina PCJ

Language: Spanish
References: 13
Page: 440-449
PDF size: 389.46 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Background: Abnormal placentation is a main preeclampsia characteristic. Its cause is a maternal spiral veins trophoblastic invasion failure, which conditions vascular resistances raise and uterus-placental perfusion decrease.
Objective: To determine the relationship between umbilical artery Doppler waveform and adverse perinatal outcome in patients with severe preeclampsia.
Patients and method: A prospective, observational and transversal study was done to analyze patients between 27 to 33 weeks of gestation with expectant management of severe preeclampsia from January 2004 to January 2006. Umbilical artery velocimetry studies were performed at least once a week by means of pulsed Doppler equipment with a 3.5 MHz transducer. Only the results of the last Doppler examination performed within 7 days of delivery were considered in the correlation with perinatal outcomes. The indications for delivery were maternal or fetal (non reassuring nonstress test or biophysical profile ≤ 4). An abnormal Doppler velocimetry was defined as pulsatility index being higher than percentile 95 for gestational age, or absent or reversed end diastolic velocity waveforms in umbilical artery. The statistical analysis was done with χ² test and Student t test.
Results: There were included 43 patients in this study. Twenty-two (52%) had an abnormal Doppler umbilical artery pulsatility index and 21 (49%) obtained a normal umbilical artery waveform. In the first group 13 (59%) had a positive end diastolic velocities with elevated pulsatility index values, end diastolic velocities were absent in seven cases (32%) and reversed in two cases (9%).
Neonates with abnormal pulsatility index had a lower birth weight (1,174 vs 1,728 g), lower Apgar score at 5 minutes, higher admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (86.4 vs 43%), and significant neonatal morbidity compared with those with normal velocimetry (p ‹ 0.05). There were no perinatal deaths with normal umbilical Doppler waveform. There were six perinatal deaths in the abnormal Doppler velocimetry. Two cases occurred with positive end diastolic velocity (15%), two cases with absent end diastolic velocity (28%) and two deaths with reversed flow of the umbilical artery (100%).
Conclusion: An abnormal Doppler umbilical artery waveform is associated with poor perinatal outcome and is a strong predictor of perinatal mortality.

REFERENCES

1. Sibai B, Dekker G, Kupferminc M. Pre-eclampsia. Lancet 2005;365:785-98.

2. Sibai M, Barton J. Expectant management of severe preeclampsia remote from term: patient selection, treatment, and delivery indications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;196:514-6.

3. Romero J, Lara A, Izquierdo J. Manejo conservador en preeclampsia severa. Ginecol Obstet Mex 2000;68:51-4.

4. Diagnosis and Management of Preeclampsia and Eclampsia. ACOG Practice Bulletin No 33. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2002;99:159-67.

5. Alfirevic Z, Neilson JP. Doppler ultrasonography in high-risk pregnancies: systematic review with meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;172:1379-87.

6. Cafici D, Mejides A, Sepúlveda W. Ultrasonografía en obstetricia y diagnóstico prenatal. 1a ed. Buenos Aires: Journal, 2005.

7. Baschat A, Hecher K. Fetal growth restriction due to placental disease. Semin Perinatol 2004;28:67-80.

8. Maulik D. Management of fetal growth restriction: an evidence based approach. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2006;49:320-34.

9. Harman C, Baschat A. Arterial and venous Dopplers in IUGR. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2003;46:931-46.

10. Yoon B, Lee C, Kim S. An abnormal umbilical artery waveform: a strong and independent predictor of adverse perinatal outcome in patients with preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;171:713-21.

11. Karsdorp V, Van Vugt J, Van Geijin H, Kostense P, et al. Clinical significance of absent or reversed end diastolic velocity waveforms in umbilical artery. Lancet 1994;344:1664-8.

12. Baschat A, Galan H, Bhide A, Berg C, et al. Doppler and biophysical assessment in growth restricted fetuses: distribution of test results. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;27:41-7.

13. Mari G, Hanif F. Intrauterine growth restriction: how to manage and when to deliver. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2007;50:497-509.