González-Block MÁ, Mercado FJ, Ochoa H, Rivera H, Idrovo ÁJ

Language: Spanish
References: 13
Page: 498-507
PDF size: 582.37 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Objective. The perceived capacity of health management teams to utilize research for decision making is assessed, as well as proposals for strengthening such capacity. Materials and Methods. A total of 103 management teams (84.4% response rate) from a wide range of institutions in six contrasting and representative states in Mexico were asked to assess their perceived capacity for utilizing research and to propose strategies to strengthen that capacity. Qualitative and statistical techniques were used from April to November 2007, after approval by the Mexico National Institute of Public Health (INSP) Ethics Commission. Results. Significant differences across states were found. Only the acquisition of knowledge is significantly correlated with the human development index. The acquisition of research is identified as the priority for strengthening capacity, through increasing the qualifications of personnel in public health research. States with a lower human development index have more immediate needs for strengthening capacity. Proposals for strengthening capacity also depend on whether decision makers are aware of the importance of research. Conclusions. The use of self-assessment should be encouraged at the state and institutional levels. Different strategies should be used to address differences among states.

REFERENCES

1. Secretaría de Salud. Salud México 2000-2005. México DF: Secretaría de Salud, 2006.

2. Lozano R, Soliz P, Gakidou E, Klafter JA, Feehan DM, Vidal C, et al. Evaluación comparativa del desempeño de los sistemas estatales de salud usando cobertura efectiva. Salud Publica Mex 2007;49(suppl 1):S53-S69.

3. Segal A. Learning by doing: science and technology in the developing world. Boulder: Westview Press, 1987.

4. Sadana R, Pang T. Health research systems: a framework for the future. Bull World Health Org 2003; 81:159.

5. Canadian Health Services Research Foundation. Is Research Working for You? Disponible en: http://www.chsrf.ca/other_documents/working_e.php

6. Hanney SR, Gonzalez-Block MA, Buxton MJ, Kogan M. The utilisation of health research in policy making: concepts, examples and methods of assessment. Health Res Pol Sys 2003;1:2; Lavis JN, Ross SE, Hurley JE, Hohenadel JM, Stoddart GL, Woodward CA, Abelson J. Examining the role of health services research in public policymaking. Milbank Q 2002; 80:125-154.

7. González-Block MA, Mercado FJ, Ochoa H, Rivera H, Idrovo AJ. Utilización de investigación por gestores de salud: desarrollo y validación de una herramienta de autodiagnóstico. Salud Publica Mex 2008;50:490-497.

8. Kuzel AJ. Sampling in qualitative inquiry. En: Crabtree B, Miller W (eds.) Doing qualitative research. Newbury Park: SAGE, 1992.

9. Varkeveeser C, Pathamathan I, Brownlee A. Designing and Conducting Health Systems Research Projects. 2nd ed. Ottawa: IDRC, 2003.

10. Mundry R, Fischer J. Use of statistical programs for nonparametric tests of small samples often leads to incorrect P values: examples from animal behaviour. Anim Behav 1998;56:256-259.

11. Siegel S, Castellan NJ. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioural sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1988.

12. CHSRF Canadian Health Services Research Foundation. Executive Training for Research Application EXTRA. Ottawa. Disponible en: http://www.chsrf.ca.

13. CTP Collaborative Training Program for Research for Policy and Action. Geneva: Alliance for Health Systems Research, 2004.