medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Cirugía Plástica

ISSN 2992-8559 (Electronic)
ISSN 1405-0625 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • Policies
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2004, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Cir Plast 2004; 14 (1)

Evaluation of burn information on the Internet

Durán VHC, Silva DT
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 13
Page: 21-26
PDF size: 69.43 Kb.


Key words:

Burns, Internet.

ABSTRACT

With the development of mass medium communication, the first answer when looking for information is the Internet. These pages show different health topics, including burns. Nevertheless, the quality or content which given about these kinds of injuries is unknown. Therefore, the information patients are provided with and their point of view is unknown. The objective of this paper was to review 100 burn related Internet pages in English as well as Spanish, in order to analyze it and classify it. Most of the pages show simple and non-professional information related to burns. The quality of the content of the pages was average to deficient. Plastic Surgery and burn organizations must provide certified information to the sites which can be found on the web and thus to those who search for it on the Internet. This can benefit the patient-doctor relationship instead of causing problems by getting wrong information via Internet.


REFERENCES

  1. Jejurikar S, Rovak J, Kuzon W et al. Evaluation of plastic surgery information on the internet. Ann Plast Surg 2002; 49: 460-465.

  2. Baker L, Wagner T, Singer S, Bundorf K. Use of the Internet and E-mail for Health Care Information: Results from a National Survey. JAMA 2003; 289(18): 2400-2406.

  3. Berland G, Elliot M, Morales L et al. Health information on the internet: Accessibility, quality, ad readability in English and Spanish. JAMA 2001; 285(20): 2612-2621.

  4. Koch H, Dabernig J, Allert S, Puchinger M, Scharnagi E. Plastic surgeons and the internet: Results of a worldwide survey. Ann Plast Surg 2002; 49: 466-471.

  5. Shani A, Sadler M, Rees G, Bateman D. The Internet. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002; 73(6): 619-628.

  6. http://www.livinginternet.com/

  7. http://www.isoc.org/internet/history/cerf.shtml

  8. http://www.zakon.org/robert/internet/timeline

  9. http://www.parallaxweb.com/internetfacts

  10. Jadad A, Sigouin Ch, Cocking L et al. Internet use among physicians, nurses and their patients. JAMA 2001; 286(12): 1451-1452.

  11. http://www.hrea.org/lists/huridocs-tech/markup/msg00193.html

  12. http://www.multichannel.com/esec/Article_92096.htm

  13. El Shazly M, Maiwald G. The Internet: A new friend to plastic surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 106(1): 235.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Cir Plast. 2004;14