medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Biomédica

Centro de Investigaciones Regionales Dr. Hideyo Noguchi, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2000, Number 4

Next >>

Rev Biomed 2000; 11 (4)

Analysis of the Revista Biomédica in its first ten years

Álvarez-Cervera FJ, Góngora-Alfaro JL, Bata-García JL, Heredia-López FJ
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 9
Page: 235-249
PDF size: 131.51 Kb.


Key words:

Revista Biomédica, medical journals.

ABSTRACT

Introduction. The Revista Biomédica celebrated its tenth anniversary with the publication of number 4 in volume 10. In this work an analysis of the contents of the journal up to that issue is presented, as well as a summary of the opinions of a sample of its readers.
Materials and Methods. The opinions of the readers were gathered by means of a survey sent to them by mail. One questionnaire was used for readers, and another one for librarians. The contents of the journal were analyzed, counting the number of articles according to type, subject, and place of affiliation of the authors. The composition of the Editorial Committee was also studied, as well as the participation of referees. Likewise, other elements, such as references made in external publications of papers that appeared in the journal, and the percentage of rejected contributions, were investigated.
Results. 142 completed questionnaires from readers (15.3% of the total sent), and 7 (6.4%) out of 109 from librarians, were received. The answers refer to the place of affiliation of the readers, to the primary activity they perform, to the type and number of articles they read, to the references in other publications to papers published in this journal, and to the general opinion they have of the journal, among other issues.
Discussion. Based on these results and on the analysis of the evolution in the contents of the journal, some changes which could contribute to its progress are proposed.


REFERENCES

  1. Zavala-Velázquez, JE. Editorial. Rev Biomed 1990; 1:3.

  2. Góngora-Biachi, RA. Análisis de la Revista Biomédica (Editorial). Rev Biomed 1995; 6:1-4.

  3. Wayt Gibbs, W. Lost science in the third world. Scientific American 1995; 273:76-83.

  4. Martínez-Chacón, ML. Publicaciones Científicas en España. Reflexiones de una editora en el campo de las ciencias de la naturaleza. Carta al editor. Rev Biomed 1996; 7:247-248.

  5. Góngora-Biachi, RA. La Revista Biomédica: una década de publicación. Rev Biomed 1999; 10:197-198.

  6. Artemisa 4. Artículos editados en México sobre información en salud. Información científica nacional sobre salud en CD-ROM. El contenido completo de las 28 mejores revistas biomédicas publicadas en México durante 1995. Centro Nacional de Información y Documentación Sobre Salud. Secretaría de Salud. México. 1996

  7. Góngora-Biachi, RA. Experiencia en la edición de la Revista Biomédica. Boletín de la AMERBAC 1999; 2:4-5.

  8. Pannell, K. La ética en las ciencias: el caso de las revistas científicas. Avance y Perspectiva 2000; 19:179-184.

  9. Pérez Angón, M. A. Revisión de dos libros “Revistas científicas en América Latina”, Cetto, A.M. y Alonso, O. (compl.), FCE, 1999, y “Los dilemas de las revistas académicas mexicanas”, Loría Díaz E. (compl.), UAEM, 1999. Avance y Perspectiva 2000; 19:253-258.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Biomed. 2000;11