medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Pediatría de México

ISSN 2007-5294 (Print)
Confederación Nacional de Pediatría de México, A. C. (CONAPEME)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2007, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Pediatr Mex 2007; 10 (2)

Morbilidad neonatal en un Hospital de segundo nivel del Estado de Tabasco

Posada-Arévalo SE, Zavala-González MA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 8
Page: 11-14
PDF size: 277.21 Kb.


Key words:

Newborn, morbility, mortality.

ABSTRACT

Objective: To measure the neonatal morbility in those born alive in the Hospital General de Zona No. 2 of the IMSS, during the years 2004 and 2005.
Design: Observational,descriptive,retrospective, transverse,.
Material: Recently born alive of the 01/01/2004 at the 12/31//2005 in the HGZ 2 of the IMSS.
Methods: Morbility, and prevalence rates for 1,000 rnv. Provide z proves between two for difference proportions.
Results: 4,078 newborn of the 01/January/2004 at the 31/December/2005, 2,161 and 1,917 for 2004 2005 respectively. Two hundred newborns hospitalized during the same period, 100 in 2004 and 100 for 2005. Morbility rates for 1,000 rnv: 46.27 and 52.16 for 2004 2005 correspondingly. Prevalences for 1,000 rnv for the years 2004 and 2005: Bacterial sepsis of the newborn (ICD P36) 13.42 and 10.95; asphyxia of the birth (ICD P21) 4.63 and 9.39; transitory taquipnea of the newborn (ICD P22.1) 5.09 and 6.78; other preterm newborn (ICD P07.3) 5.55 and 5.74; syndrome of diabetic mother’s newborn (ICD P70.1) 1.39 and 5.22.
Conclusions: The most frequent illnesses in our newborns are the bacterial sepsis of the newborn and the asphyxia, agreeing with that reported by the international references; we ignore the causes and the associate factors, what will be study reason. There was not neonatal mortality, the serious patients were already referred to another unit because we don’t have Unit of Neonatal Intensive Cares.


REFERENCES

  1. OPS/OMS. Las condiciones de salud en las Américas. Edición 2000. Publicación Científica Nº549. Washington, D.C., 2000.

  2. Best practices: detecting and treating newborn asphyxia. Baltimore, MD, JHPIEGO, 2004 (http://www.mnh.jhpiego.org/best/detasphyxia.pdf, visitado el 16 de febrero de 2005).

  3. Verhoeff FH, Le Cessie S, Kalanda BF, Kazembe PN, Broadhead RL, Brabin BJ. Post-neonatal infant mortality in Malawi: the importance of maternal health. Annals of Tropical Paediatrics, 2004, 24:161-169.

  4. Grantham-McGregor SM, Lira PI, Ashworth A, Morris SS, Assuncao AM. The development of low birth weight term infants and the effects of the environment in northeast Brazil. Journal of Pediatrics, 1998, 132: 661-666.

  5. Godfrey KM, Barker DL. Fetal nutrition and adult disease. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2000, 71(Suppl.):1344S-1352S.

  6. UNICEF/OMS. Low birthweight: country, regional and global estimates. Nueva York, NY, Fondo de las Naciones Unidas para la Infancia, 2004.

  7. Caulfield L. Nutritional interventions in reducing perinatal and neonatal mortality. In: Reducing perinatal and neonatal mortality. Report of a meeting, Baltimore, MD, 10-12 May 1999. Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, 1999 (Child Health Research Project Special Report, Vol. 3, No. 1).

  8. Tinker A. Safe motherhood is a vital social and economic investment. Documento presentado a). la Technical Consultation on Safe Motherhood, Safe Motherhood Inter-Agency Group, Colombo, Sri Lanka, 18-23 de octubre de 1997 (http://safemotherhood.org/resources/pdf/aa-06_invest.pdf, visitado el 15 de febrero de 2004




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Pediatr Mex. 2007;10