Cirugía y Cirujanos

Contents by Year, Volume and Issue

Table of Contents

General Information

Instructions for Authors

Message to Editor

Editorial Board

>Journals >Cirugía y Cirujanos >Year 2009, Issue 5

Robles-Castillo J, Murillo-Zolezzi A, Murakami PD, Silva-Velasco J
Reparación primaria versus colostomía en lesiones del colon
Cir Cir 2009; 77 (5)

Language: Español
References: 13
Page: 365-368
PDF: 72.53 Kb.

Full text


Background: Colon trauma is frequent and its prevalence is difficult to establish because of the different factors that intervene in its origin. In Mexico, traumatic colon injuries, albeit stab wounds or gunshot wounds, are on the rise. Our objective was to evaluate the most appropriate management for traumatic colon injuries.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of 178 case files of patients with abdominal trauma and colon lesions during a 5-year period from January 2003 to June 2008 from the General Hospital of Balbuena. The study compared the use of primary closure vs. colostomy, analyzing variables such as sex, age, type of wound, severity of lesion and mortality.
Results: There were a total of 178 patients; 156 were male (87.6%) and 22 were female (12.4%). The most affected age group was between 21 and 30 years; 74 patients (41.6%) had stab wounds and 104 patients (58.4%) had gunshot wounds. Management consisted mainly of primary closure in 92 cases (51.7%) vs. colostomy in 86 patients (48.3%). However, 64% of gunshot wounds were treated with colostomy. Reported mortality was 9.55% and this was due to different factors such as multiple organ injury.
Conclusions: Treatment of traumatic colon injury should be case specific, taking into account the mechanism of the lesion, its severity and associated injuries.

Key words: Colon, trauma, primary closure, colostomy.


  1. Sánchez RF, Castellanos RJ. Asociación Mexicana de Cirugía General. Consejo Mexicano de Cirugía General. Tratado de cirugía general. México: El Manual Moderno; 2003. pp. 1161-1166.

  2. Burch JM. Injury to the colon and rectum. In: Mattox KL, Feliciano D, Moore E. Trauma. 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2008.

  3. American College of Surgeons. ATLS, programa avanzado de apoyo vital en trauma para médicos. Sexta edición. Chicago: Comité de Trauma del Colegio Americano de Cirujanos; 1997.

  4. Taylor G, Lond MS. Discussion on the diagnosis and treatment of injuries of the intestines. Br Med J 1921;2:639.

  5. Botero M, Ramírez H, Suárez R. Trauma de colon y recto. Guías de actuación en urgencias y emergencias. Trauma. Disponible en http://www.ascrs.org

  6. Codina RA, Pujadas M, Rodríguez HJ, Martín GA, Farrés CR. Estado actual de los traumatismos colorrectoanales. Cir Esp 2006;79:143-148.

  7. Baker LW, Thomson SR, Chadwick SJ. Colon wound management and prograde colonic lavage in large bowel trauma. Br J Surg 1990;77:872-876.

  8. Molina CJ, Guzmán TF, Sneyder R. Tratamiento de las lesiones traumáticas de colon. Hospital Universitario de Maracaibo (1996-1998). Medicina Crítica Venezolana 1999;14:21-25.

  9. Abarca F, Rendón J. Reparación primaria versus colostomía en lesiones por trauma de colon de origen civil. Rev Mex Coloproctol 2006;12:117-121.

  10. Andrade PE. Traumatismos del colon. Reseña histórica y manejo quirúrgico. Univ Med 1986;28:51-52.

  11. Moore EE, Cogbill Th, Malangoni MA, Jurkovich GJ, Champion HR, Gennarelli TA, et al. Organ injury scaling. II: Pancreas, duodenum, small bowel, colon and rectum. J Trauma 1990;30:1427-1429.

  12. Demetriades D, Murrias JA, Chan LS, Ordoñez C, Bowley D, Nagy KK, et al. Handsewn versus stapled anastomosis in penetrating colon injuries requiring resection: A multicenter study. J Trauma 2002;52:117-121.

  13. Brunicardi CF. Schwartz’s Principles of Surgery. 8th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2005. pp. 171-173, 1112-1115.

>Journals >Cirugía y Cirujanos >Year 2009, Issue 5

· Journal Index 
· Links 

Copyright 2019