medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Oftalmología

Anales de la Sociedad Mexicana de Oftalmología y Archivos de la Asociación Para Evitar la Ceguera en México
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2010, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Oftalmol 2010; 84 (1)

Cirugía de extracción extracapsular de catarata con incisión pequeña versus convencional, realizadas por residentes

Arrazola-Vázquez JC, Morfín-Salido IL, Moya-Romero JO
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 11
Page: 25-29
PDF size: 88.19 Kb.


Key words:

Cataract, MSICS, ECCE, astigmtism, best corrected visual acuity, residents.

ABSTRACT

Aim: To compare the efficiency of the MSICS as a safe alternative technique for cataract surgery with lower cost and less surgery time, and the conventional ECCE. Besides it offers an affordable surgery to the patient and the institution. Method: This paper reports a comparative, longitudinal, observational, prospective randomize and open study with a retrospective control group; it included a total of 42 patients which were divided in 2 groups for cataract surgery, ECCE and MSICS. All the surgeries were performed by residents, the results were classified by complications, best corrected visual acuity, with a minimal of 3 months of follow up. Results: Patients that presented 20/20 with no correction were 7 (44%) in MSICS and 1 (5%) in ECCE; patients that presented 20/40 or better were 20 (96%) of the MSICS group and 10 (48%) of the ECCE group. Surgeries that lasted 60 min or less were 15 (72%) in MSICS and 3 (15%) in ECCE. The induced astigmatism of 1.50 diopter or less was reported in 21 (100%) of the MSICS and in 7 (44%) of the ECCE cases.


REFERENCES

  1. Javitt JC, Wang F, West SK. Blindness due to Cataract: Epidemiology and Prevention. Ann Rev Pub Heal 1996; 17(1):159- 177.

  2. Brian G, Taylor H. Cataract blindness – challenges for the 21st century, Bulletin of the WHO. Fuente: http://www.hollows. org.au/Assets/Files/Annual_Report_2000.pdf

  3. WHO Global Initiative for the Elimination of Avoidable Blindness, Geneva, July 1996. Fuente: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/ hq/1997/WHO_PBL_97.61.pdf

  4. Haldipurkar S, Shikari H, Gokhale V. Wound constructions in manual small incision cataract surgery. Indian J Ophthalmol 2009; 57:9-13.

  5. Venkatesh R, Vena K, Ravindran R. Capsulotomy and hidroprocedures for nucleus prollapse in manual small incision cataract surgery. Indian J Ophthalmol 2009; 57:15-18.

  6. Gokhale N. Viscoexpression technique in manual small incision cataract surgery. Indian J Ophthalmol 2009; 57:39-40.

  7. Srinivasan A. Nucleus management with irrigating vectis. Indian J Ophthalmol 2009; 57:19-21.

  8. Malik K, Goel R. Nucleus management with Blumenthal technique: anterior chamber maintainer. Indian J Ophthalmol 2009; 57:23-25.

  9. Henning A. Nucleus management with fishhook. Indian J Ophthalmol 2009; 57:35-37

  10. Bhatthacharya D. Nucleus management in manual small incision cataract surgery by snare technique. Indian J Ophthalmol 2009; 57:27-29.

  11. Gotage P. Small incision cataract surgery: Complications and mini-review. Indian J Ophthalmol 2009; 57:45-49.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Oftalmol. 2010;84