medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista del Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias

A partir del año 2010, la Revista Oficial del INER cambió a NCT (Neumología y Cirugía de Tórax)

Ver actualización

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2003, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Inst Nal Enf Resp Mex 2003; 16 (2)

Chronic laryngitis due to voice abuse in voice professionals is associated to non-apparent gastroesophagic reflux.

Bracamontes ME, Astorga TR, Jiménez MMC
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 18
Page: 64-69
PDF size: 56.85 Kb.


Key words:

Chronic laryngitis, voice abuse, gastroesophageal reflux.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Gastroesophageal reflux can generate otolaryngological alterations such as chronic laryngitis. The management for these patients is with antireflux medication. Voice abuse can also be responsible for laryngeal lesions and the choice treatment is phoniatric therapy. At the Otorhinolaryngology department of the Hospital “Valentín Gómez Farías” ISSSTE Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico. We observed that patients with voice abuse who do not respond with phoniatric therapy, improve with antireflux therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate antireflux treatment in patients with clinical manifestations of chronic laryngitis and dysphonia caused by voice abuse without clinical or endoscopic manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux. Patients and methods: We studied 30 professional voice patients with chronic laryngitis and dysphonia caused by voice abuse without clinic or endoscopic manifestations of reflux. Patients were divided in two study groups: Group 1 were treated with phoniatric therapy and modifications in their diet and hygienic habits; Group 2 received, besides voice therapy, pharmacological treatment with ranitidine and cisapride at conventional doses. Clinical evolution was evaluated at the beginning of the study and 4 and 8 weeks after. In both groups we determined the presence of dysphonia (mild, moderate, severe), laryngitis (mild, moderate, severe), pharyngodynia, foreign body sensation, and cough during treatment. Results: At the beginning of the study, 100% of the patients in Group 1 had dysphonia (46.7% moderate, 53.3% severe); 100% laryngitis (33.3% moderate, 66.6 % severe); 80% pharyngodynia; 53.3% foreign body sensation and 40% cough. In Group 2, 100% of the patients had dysphonia (40% moderate, 60% severe); 100% laryngitis (33.3% moderate, 66.6% severe); 66.6% pharyngodynia; 66.6% foreign body sensation; 26.6% cough. At the end of the study, 100% of the patients in Group I had dysphonia (40% moderate, 60% severe); 100% laryngitis (26.6% moderate, 73.3% severe); 80% pharyngodynia; 60% foreign body sensation and 33.3% cough. In Group 2, 100% of the patients had dysphonia (26.6% mild, 46.6% moderate, 26.6% severe); 100% laryngitis (33.3% mild, 53.3% moderate, 13.3% severe); 40% pharyngodynia; 46.6% foreign body sensation and 13.3% cough . Discussion and conclusion: Results of this study show that professional voice patients with chronic laryngitis, dysphonia and pharyngodynia who do not respond with conventional phoniatric therapy, improve with ranitidine and cisapride. Taken together, present results suggest that chronic laryngitis could be associated to non-apparent gastroesophageal reflux in patients with voice abuse.


REFERENCES

  1. Koufman JA. The otolaryngologic manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD): A clinical investigation of 225 patients using ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring and an experimental investigation of the role of acid and pepsin in the development of laryngeal injury. Laryngoscope 1991;101(53 Suppl):1S-64S.

  2. El-Serag HB, Sonnenberg A. Comorbid occurrence of laryngeal or pulmonary disease with esophagitis in United States military veterans. Gastroenterology 1997;113:755-760.

  3. Gaynor EB. Laryngeal complications of GERD. J Clin Gastroenterol 2000;30(3 Suppl):31S-34S.

  4. Koufman JA. Laryngopharyngeal reflux is different from classic gastroesophageal reflux disease. Ear Nose Throat J 2002;81(9 Suppl 2):7S-9S.

  5. Preciado JA, Garcia Tapia R, Infante JC. Prevalence of voice disorders among educational professionals. Factors contributing to their appearance or their persistence. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 1998;49:137-142.

  6. Mattiske JA, Oates JM, Greenwood KM. Vocal problems among teachers: a review of prevalence, causes, prevention, and treatment. J Voice 1998;12:489-499.

  7. DeVault KR. Overview of therapy for the extraesophageal manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2000;95(8 Suppl):39S-44S.

  8. Katz PO. Gastroesophageal reflux disease: New treatments. Rev Gastroenterol Disord 2002;2:66-74.

  9. Lee KJ. Essential otolaryngology. Head & Neck Surgery. 7a ed. USA: McGrawHill, 1999.

  10. Rosen CA, Anderson D, Murry T. Evaluating hoarseness: keeping your patient’s voice healthy. Am Fam Physician 1998;57:2775-2782.

  11. Dawson-Saunders B, Trapp R. Exploración y análisis de datos. En: Bioestadística médica. 2a ed. México: Manual Moderno,1998:25-47.

  12. Sarani B, Gleiber M, Evans SR. Esophageal pH monitoring, indications, and methods. J Clin Gastroenterol 2002;34:200-206.

  13. Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Koufman JA. The validity and reliability of the reflux finding score (RFS). Laryngoscope 2001;111:1313-1317.

  14. Arora AS, Castell DO. Medical therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Mayo Clin Proc 2001;76:102-106.

  15. Adams MH, Ostrosky JD, Kirkwood CF. Therapeutic evaluation of omeprazole. Clin Pharm 1988;7:725-745.

  16. McCallum RW, Prakash C, Campoli-Richards DM, Goa KL. Cisapride. A preliminary review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use as a prokinetic agent in gastrointestinal motility disorders. Drugs 1988;36:652-681.

  17. Mattiske JA, Oates JM, Greenwood KM. Vocal problems among teachers: a review of prevalence, causes, prevention, and treatment. J Voice 1998;12:489-499.

  18. Graham DY, Smith JL, Patterson DJ. Why do apparently healthy people use antacid tablets? Am J Gastroenterol 1983;78:257-260.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Inst Nal Enf Resp Mex. 2003;16