medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Boletín Médico del Hospital Infantil de México

Boletín Médico del Hospital Infantil de México
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2010, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex 2010; 67 (3)

Rethinking ethical decision-making in pediatrics

Altamirano BNF, Bobadilla AA, Altamirano BE, Garduño EJ, Ávila OMT, Muñoz HO, García PR, Altamirano BMM
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 18
Page: 188-195
PDF size: 170.33 Kb.


Key words:

ethical decision-making, clinical dilemmas, bioethics.

ABSTRACT

A challenge for 21st century medicine is to rediscover the value of philanthropy and philotechnia in contemporary clinical practice because both are terms that adapt to our more current understanding of how value-based medicine and evidence-based medicine must always go “hand in hand.” Our proposal is to offer an integral ethical deliberation method that implies a holistic view of the ethical dilemmas in pediatric clinical practice.


REFERENCES

  1. Jonsen AR, Siegler M, Winslade WJ. Clinical Ethics: A Practical approach to ethical decisions in clinical medicine. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1998.

  2. Pellegrino ED. The internal morality of clinical medicine: a paradigm for the ethics of the helping and healing professions. J Med Philos 2001;26:559-579.

  3. Calderon D. Proporcionalidad y bienes escasos. Medicina y ética. Rev Int Bioética Deontol Etica Méd 2006;17: 59-66.

  4. Fins JJ, Miller FG, Bacchetta MD. Clinical pragmatism: bridging theory and practice. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 1998;8:37-42.

  5. Fins JJ. Approximation and negotiation: clinical pragmatism and difference. Cambridge Q Healthcare Ethics 1998;7:68-76.

  6. Fins JJ, Blacksher E. The ethics of managed care: report on a Congress of Clinical Societies. J Am Geriatr Soc 1998;46:309-313.

  7. Steinkamp N, Gordijn B. Ethical case deliberation on the ward. A comparison of four methods. Med Health Care Philos 2003;6:235-246.

  8. Steinkamp NL. European debates on ethical case deliberation. Med Health Care Philos 2003;6:225-226.

  9. Severijnen R, Hulstijn-Dirkmaat I, Gordijn B, Bakker L, Bongaerts G. Acute loss of the small bowel in a school-age boy. Difficult choices: to sustain life or to stop treatment? Eur J Pediatr 2003;162:794-798.

  10. Jonsen AR, Siegler M, Winslade WJ. Clinical Ethics: A Practical approach to ethical decisions in clinical medicine. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1998.

  11. Pellegrino ED. The internal morality of clinical medicine: a paradigm for the ethics of the helping and healing professions. J Med Philos 2001;26:559-579.

  12. Calderon D. Proporcionalidad y bienes escasos. Medicina y ética. Rev Int Bioética Deontol Etica Méd 2006;17: 59-66.

  13. Fins JJ, Miller FG, Bacchetta MD. Clinical pragmatism: bridging theory and practice. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 1998;8:37-42.

  14. Fins JJ. Approximation and negotiation: clinical pragmatism and difference. Cambridge Q Healthcare Ethics 1998;7:68-76.

  15. Fins JJ, Blacksher E. The ethics of managed care: report on a Congress of Clinical Societies. J Am Geriatr Soc 1998;46:309-313.

  16. Steinkamp N, Gordijn B. Ethical case deliberation on the ward. A comparison of four methods. Med Health Care Philos 2003;6:235-246.

  17. Steinkamp NL. European debates on ethical case deliberation. Med Health Care Philos 2003;6:225-226.

  18. Severijnen R, Hulstijn-Dirkmaat I, Gordijn B, Bakker L, Bongaerts G. Acute loss of the small bowel in a school-age boy. Difficult choices: to sustain life or to stop treatment? Eur J Pediatr 2003;162:794-798.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex. 2010;67