medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista de Endocrinología y Nutrición

ISSN 0188-9796 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2010, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Endocrinol Nutr 2010; 18 (1)

Differentiated thyroid carcinoma at the Hospital de Especialidades, Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, IMSS: Analysis focusing on stimulated thyroglobulin levels according to risk groups

Hernández-Martínez AF, Hernández-García I, Jervis-Solines P, Hidalgo-Funes L, Ramírez-Rentería C, Mercado M
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 7
Page: 6-10
PDF size: 193.99 Kb.


Key words:

Differentiated thyroid carcinoma, recurrence, radioiodine.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) is the most common endocrine malignancy and its follow-up using stimulated thyroglobulin (sTg)) is of great utility. Several classifications have been proposed trying to identify risk factors associated with persistence, recurrence and mortality for this cancer. Objective: To describe the demographic characteristics of a subset of our patients with DTC and evaluate the relationship between the TNM classification and the Risk Classification Guidelines proposed by the Mexican Society of Nutrition and Endocrinology (SMNE) (modified) with sTg after one year of initial treatment. Material and methods: Clinical and pathologic data of 150 patients were recorded, and both classifications were applied. A sub-analysis was performed in 67 patients who had sTg measurements available, in the absence of Tg antibodies after one year of initial treatment. Results: The TNM system classified 80.5% of the patients in stages I and II; the highest sTg evel (median 34.7 ng/mL) was found in a group of 7 subjects (10.4%) who were categorized as stage IV A. In contrast, using the risk stratification system of the SMNE 49.3% of the patients were categorized as high risk, regardless of age (younger or older than 45) or sTg level. Conclusions: The apparent discrepancies between these 2 classification systems found in the present study highlight the importance of an individualized assessment of patients with DTC.


REFERENCES

  1. Mazzaferri EL, Kloos RT. Current approaches to primary therapy for papillary and follicular thyroid cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001; 86: 1447-1463.

  2. Lundgren IC, Hall P, Dickman PW, Zedenius J. Clinically significant prognostic factors for differentiated thyroid carcinoma. A population-based, nested case–control study. Cancer 2005; 106: 524-531.

  3. Pacini F. Follow-up of differentiated thyroid cancer. Eur J Nucl Med 2002; 29: (Suppl. 2): S492–S496.

  4. Lang BH, Lo CY, Chan WF, Lam KY, Wan KY. Staging systems for papillary thyroid carcinoma: a review and comparison. Ann Surg 2007; 245: 366-378.

  5. Guía Clínica para el Diagnóstico y Tratamiento del Cáncer Diferenciado de Tiroides. En: http://www.endocrinologia.org.mx/v2/paginas/concenso.php

  6. Shaha AR. TNM Classification of thyroid carcinoma. World J Surg 2007; 31: 879-887.

  7. Cooper DS, Doherty GM, Haugen BR, et al. Revised American Thyroid Association management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid 2009; 19: 1167-1214.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Endocrinol Nutr. 2010;18