medigraphic.com
Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública

2010, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

salud publica mex 2010; 52 (4)

Calculating the optimum size of a hemodialysis unit based on infrastructure potential

Ávila-Palomares P, López-Cervantes M, Durán-Arenas L

Language: Spanish
References: 13
Page: 315-323
PDF size: 139.36 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective. To estimate the optimum size for hemodialysis units to maximize production given capital constraints. Materials and Methods. A national study in Mexico was conducted in 2009. Three possible methods for estimating a unit’s optimum size were analyzed: hemodialysis services production under monopolistic market, under a perfect competitive market and production maximization given capital constraints. Results. The third method was considered best based on the assumptions made in this paper; an optimal size unit should have 16 dialyzers (15 active and one back up dialyzer) and a purifier system able to supply all. It also requires one nephrologist, five nurses per shift, considering four shifts per day. Conclusion. Empirical evidence shows serious inefficiencies in the operation of units throughout the country. Most units fail to maximize production due to not fully utilizing equipment and personnel, particularly their water purifier potential which happens to be the most expensive asset for these units.


REFERENCES

  1. Brenner BM, Levine SA. Brenner and Rector’s the kidney. [Internet]. Philadelphia: Saunders an imprint of Elsevier. 2008; vol.1: 616-629. [Consultado 2009 Abr 10]. Disponible en: http://www.mdconsult.com/

  2. Pecoits-Filho R, Abensur H, Cueto-Manzano AM, Dominguez J, Divino- Filho JC, Fernandez-Cean J, et al.Overview of peritoneal dialysis in Latin America. Perit Dial Int [Internet] 2007; 27: 316–321. [Consultado 2009 Abr 10] Disponible en: http://www.pdiconnect.com/cgi/reprint/27/3/316.pdf

  3. Obrador GT, Ruthazer R, Arora P, Kausz AT, Pereira BJ. Prevalence of and factors associated with suboptimal care before initiation of dialysis in the United States. J Am Soc Nephrol [Internet] 1999; 10: 1793 – 800. [Consultado 2010 Mar 03]. Disponible en: http://jasn.asnjournals.org/cgi/ reprint/10/8/1793.pdf

  4. Just PM, de Charro FT, Tschosik EA, Noe LL, Bhattacharyya SK, Riella MC. Reimbursment and economic factors influencing dialysis modality choice around the world. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008; 23: 2365-2373.

  5. Just PM, Riella MC, Tschosik EA, Noe LL, Bhattacharyya SK, de Charro FT. Economic evaluations of dialysis treatment modalities. Health Pol [Internet] 2008; 86: 163 – 180. [Consultado 2008 Nov 5]. Disponible en: http://www.journals.elsevierhealth.com/periodicals/heap/article/S0168- 8510(07)00287-4/abstract

  6. Grassman A, Gioberge S, Moeller S, Brown G. ESRD patients in 2004: global overview of patient numbers, modalities and associated trends. Nephrol Dial Transplant [Internet] 2005; 20: 2587-2593. [Consultado 2008 Dic 11]. Disponible en: http://ndt.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/ full/20/12/2587

  7. Treviño-Becerra A. Tratamientos sustitutivos en enfermedad renal: diálisis peritoneal, hemodiálisis y transplante renal. Cir Ciruj [Internet] 2009; 77: 411 - 15. [Consultado 2010 Mar 03]. Disponible en: http://new. medigraphic.com/cgi-bin/resumen.cgi?IDREVISTA=10&IDARTICULO=228 36&IDPUBLICACION=2323&NOMBRE=Cirug%EDa%20y%20Cirujanos

  8. Paniagua R, Amato D, Vonesh E, Correa-Rotter R, Ramos A, Moran J. Effects of increased peritoneal clearances on mortality rates in peritoneal dialysis: ADEMEX, a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Am Soc Nephrol 2002; 13: 1307-1320.

  9. López-Cervantes M, Rojas-Rusell ME, Tirado-Gómez CL, Durán- Arenas L, Pacheco-Domínguez RL, Venado-Estrada AA, et al. Enfermedad renal crónica y su atención mediante tratamiento sustitutivo en México. México DF: Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 2009.

  10. 10 United States Renal Data System. USRDS 2008 Annual Data Report: Atlas of Chronic Kidney Disease and End-Stage Renal Disease in the United States. Minneapolis: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 2008. [Consultado 2009 Mar 12]. Disponible en: http://www.usrds.org/adr.htm

  11. 11 Subsecretaría de Prevención y Control de Enfermedades. Insuficiencia Renal Crónica. Práctica Médica Efectiva. México: INSP [Internet] 2000; vol. 2: 6. [Consultado 2009 Ene 6]. Disponible en: http://www.insp.mx/Portal/ Centros/ciss/nls/boletin_practicamedica.html

  12. Página de Grupo Peter Taboada. [Internet]. Pontevedra, España: Peter Taboada Tecnología Avanzada del Agua; 2009. [Consultado 2009 Jun 20]. Disponible en: http://www.petertaboada.com/petseatw_04.htm

  13. Secretaría de Salud. NORMA Oficial Mexicana NOM-171-SSA1-1998, Para la práctica de hemodiálisis. México, DF: Secretaría de Salud; 2007. [Consultado 2009 Ene 15]. Disponible en: http://www.salud.gob.mx/ unidades/cdi/nom/171ssa18.html




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com