medigraphic.com
ISSN 0001-0944 (Print)
Órgano Oficial de la Asociación Dental Mexicana

2000, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev ADM 2000; 57 (3)

Vertical control and mandibular response, key elements in an orthodontic treatment

Cardiel RSA, Palacio GMG

Language: Spanish
References: 16
Page: 109-117
PDF size: 285.04 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The clinical practice of orthodontics must be based on a sound philosophy of treatment and diagnosis that takes into account the quantitative and qualitative favorable or unfavorable results achieved with such a treatment. Factors identified to be essential in contributing to successful and unsuccessful treatment results are discussed and how they are related to growth and development of the patient in active treatment, involving biomechanical elements to achieve results.


REFERENCES

  1. Gardner RA, Harris FE, Vaden JL. Postorthodontic dental changes: a longitudinal study. Ajo Do 1998; 114-5: 581-586.

  2. Gebeck TR, Mierrifield LL. Analysis: concepts and values, part I, Journal of the Charles H. Tweed internation foundation 1989; 17: 19-48.

  3. Casko JS, Vaden JL, Kokich VG et al. Objective grading system for dental casts and panoramic radiographic. Ajo Do 1998; 114-5: 589-599.

  4. Jegou I. Smile... With Tweed Techniques. Journal of the Charles H. Tweed foundation 1986; 14: 97-109.

  5. Horn A, Jegou I. A look at soft tissue modifications, Journal of the Charles H. Tweed Foundation 1988; 16: 43-57.

  6. Merrifield LL. Differential diagnosis with total space analysis. Journal of the Charles H. Tweed Foundation 1978; 6: 10-15.

  7. Tweed CH. The Frankfort mandibular incisor angle (FMIA) in orthodontic diagnose, treatment planning and prognosis. Ajo Oral Surgery 1954; 24: 121-69.

  8. Merrifield LL. The profile lines an aid in critically evaluating facial esthetics. Ajo 1966; 11: 804-22.

  9. Pearson LE. Vertical control in fully banded orthodontic treatment. The Angle Orthodontist 1986; 56: 205-24.

  10. Horn A. Facial height indey. Ajo Do 1992; 102: 180-6.

  11. Noffel SE. Danger signs of the occlusion face, Journal of the Charles H. Tweed foundation 1986; 14: 50-96.

  12. Lamarque SL. The importance of occlusal plane control during orthodontic mechanoterapy. Ajo Do 1995; 107: 548-558.

  13. Harris GS. Analysis of mandibular response, en prensa.

  14. Klontz HA. Facial balance and harmony an attainable objective for the patient with a high mandibular plane angle. Ajo Do 1998; 114-2: 176-188.

  15. James RD. A comparative study of facial profiles in extraction and non extraction treatment. Ajo Do 1998; 114-3: 265-276.

  16. Czarnecki ST, Nanda RS, Currier GF. Perceptions of a balanced facial profile. Ajo Do 1993; 104(2): 180-87.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com