Vázquez GJC, Salas HJ, Fernández VM, Palomar LA, Pérez PJR

Language: Spanish
References: 14
Page: 64-74
PDF size: 238.99 Kb.

ABSTRACT

The number of specialists in pulmonary medicine in Mexico is bellowing the minimal recommendations with an inappropriate geographical distribution between the states and the cities. In this study, we evaluated the respirologist growth in the past 15 years. Moreover, the geographical distribution of specialists by the states and cities with a population higher than 100 thousand people was explored. We analyzed the professional residence of all respirologist with a full membership registered in the database of the Mexican Respiratory Society. A total of 775 respirologists were professionally found in Mexico; among these specialists, only 105 were pediatric pulmunologist. The current number of respirologist represents 74% more specialists compared with those registered in 1995 (446 physicians). The respirologist annual growth rate was in average 22 physicians. Almost one half of all specialists in pulmonary medicine (373) are employed in Mexico City. By contrast, there are none o very few specialists in some states in Mexico and in many big cities. Estimations in the population growth, particularly people older than 65 years may forecast a higher demand for medical services, including pulmonary medicine. In conclusion, despite the growth in respirologists during the past 15 years, pulmonary medicine supply is still bellow the minimal recommendations in Mexico. Moreover, there is an inappropriate geographical distribution of specialists between the states and the cities. The enrolment of trainees should be considerably increased in the next few years; otherwise the scarce of respiratory medical supply will persist for many years.

REFERENCES

1. Mason HR. Manpower needs by specialty. JAMA 1972;291:1621-1626.

2. Murray JF, Coates EO Jr, Nadel JA, et ál. Survey of professional manpower in pulmonary diseases. Am Rev Respir Dis 1973;107:879-881.

3. Schleiter MK, Tarlov AR, Weil PA. National Study of Internal Medicine Manpower: VII. Residency and fellowship training 1976-1977 through 1980-1981. Ann Intern Med 1981;95:762-768.

4. Angus DC, Kelley MA, Schmitz RJ, White A, Popovich J Jr; and Committee on Manpower for Pulmonary and Critical Care Societies (COMPACCS). Caring for the critically ill patient. Current and projected workforce requirements for care the critically ill and patients with pulmonary disease: can we meet the requirements of an aging population? JAMA 2000; 284:2762-2770.

5. Pingleton SK. Committee on Manpower of Pulmonary and Critical Care Societies: a report to membership (editorial). Chest 2001;120:327-328.

6. Block AJ. Is anyone paying attention? (editorial). Chest 2001:120:1431-1432.

7. Ferkol T, Zeitlin P, Abman S, Blaisdell CJ, O’Brodovich H.NHLBI Training workshop report: the vanishing pediatric pulmonary investigator and recommendations for recovery. Pediatr Pulmonol 2010;45:25-33.

8. Ruiz JA, Molina J, Nigenda G. Médicos y el mercado de trabajo en México. En: Fundación Mexicana para la Salud, editor. Caleidoscopio de la salud. México, D.F.: Funsalud; 2003 páginas

9. Nigenda G, Ruiz, JA, Bejarano R. Educación y mano de obra el despilfarro de los médicos en México: hacia la construcción de una metodología común. Human Resources for Health 2005;3:3-3.

10. Pérez-Padilla JR, Chapela MR. ¿Cuántos neumólogos necesitamos en México? (editorial). Neumol Cir Torax 1995;64:4-8.

11. Reinhardt UE. The economist’s model of physician behavior. JAMA 1999;281:462-465.

12. Weiner JP. Forecasting the effects of health reform on US physician workforce requirement. Evidence from HMO staffing patterns. JAMA 1994;272:222-230.

13. De la Garza-Aguilar J. Reflexiones sobre la calidad de la carrera de medicina en México. Gac Méd Méx 2005;141:129-141.

14. Consejo Nacional de Población. Envejecimiento de la población en México. Reto del siglo XXI. México: Conapo; 2005.