medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Salud Mental

ISSN 0185-3325 (Print)
Órgano Oficial del Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2010, Number 5

<< Back Next >>

Salud Mental 2010; 33 (5)

Factores asociados a la búsqueda y uso de servicios de salud: del modelo psicosocial al socioeconómico

Arredondo A
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 39
Page: 397-408
PDF size: 138.44 Kb.


Key words:

Search, use health services.

ABSTRACT

This article includes the results of a multi-level conceptual approach review, considering four models of analysis, delving into the determinants and the explanatory factors in the process of search and use of health services. Such models are: psychosocial, epidemiological, sociological, and socio-economic. The implications, determinants, and characteristics of utilization of health care services have been subject to scrutiny since the eighties. Research on this matter has not been independent of the process of reform, which has been carried out simultaneously in virtually every country in the world. In fact, establishing adequate health services for patients who need them most has become a generally accepted priority.
For the purpose of this study, and as a preamble to understanding the process of search and use of health services, the concept of need, along with its applications in the different models of service use, must be defined. In the literature, there are four types of need: a) normative need, that which is expert-defined as such in a given situation, b) felt need, which corresponds to a perceived lack of something beneficial to the individual, c) expressed need, one not only experienced, but also articulated by the individual, and d) comparative need, i.e. a standard that meets the same characteristics of another receiving certain coverage or service.
This paper will refer to the expressed need, which may or may not correspond exactly to the use of health care services. Along the same lines, the concept of demand, applied from an economic perspective, will be utilized as a synonym for use.
The implementation of reform processes and the evaluation of the possible implications of such reforms require extensive knowledge regarding the determinants of use of health care services. A main determinant can be identified, for example, when an individual uses such services, sometimes repeatedly, because he is in a situation of need (experienced), understood as the perception of discomfort or illness. There are certain biological differences (i.e. sex and age) that might explain some of the variations observed in the relationship between situations of need and use.
However, could there be other reasons that would lead to use? If so, this situation might create unnecessary extra work for professional health care providers preventing them from engaging the real needs of the population served; on the other hand, if there are any other motives (besides the absence of necessity) causing an individual, or group of individuals, not to meet his care needs, he may be at risk. It is widely known that not all health problems are reported to physicians by patients at the time of consultation. Also, there are great numbers of single users who are responsible for the utilization of a large portion of consultations intended for that population, taking advantage and, occasionally, using health services without having, from a medical standpoint, a clear justification to do so.
These examples are extremes that can be observed as patterns of use that are determined by the perceived need for health and a long list of factors described from different disciplinary perspectives. Analyzing the search and use of health services implies studying availability and accessibility to them. Although the measurement of these variables is not exact, it is used in most studies. When considering use by socio-economic group accessibility, the fairness of the system in question is also evaluated. This is highly relevant because problems of use of services are related to health equity and accessibility, two challenges currently being addressed by a substantive reform of the health systems in most countries of the world; particularly in Latin America, and more so in Mexico.
Thus, this paper intends to address, through a review of different theoretical models, factors affecting the search and use of health services. It assumes that the central premise in the context of health sector reforms in Latin America, especially in Mexico, is that the health service users have come to occupy a leading role in establishing the health needs addressed by care systems. Indeed, the main issues of structural adjustment in health systems are related to setting health needs according to epidemiological changes, changes in perception of diseases, and changes in the variables of equity, efficiency, coverage, and accessibility to health systems for different population groups. From this new perspective, the health systems, in turn, propose relevant changes in the interaction between the two main social actors within this reform process: first, the behavior of suppliers (any institution that provides health services to the population), and second, the behavior and perceptions of consumers (population using health services demanded from a particular institution).
The path converges when both social actors represent the process of seeking and obtaining medical care, as determined by a number of variables and constraints addressed in this article through different conceptual approaches, i.e. whenever the explanatory conceptual model is used, the process of medical care is primarily conceived as two chains of activities and events where participants are parallel –the care- giver on the one hand, and the client or user of health services on the other. In an extended approach, use and its determinants have much to do with the study of accessibility, coverage, and equity in health. Some authors claim that, under this approach, the study of accessibility and coverage in health are made identical to the determinants of service utilization. This wider vision includes various aspects, considering use as a schematic sequence of events from the time the need for medical attention arises until it initiates/is followed by the use of medical services. Throughout this process, psychosocial and epidemiological determinants of care are identified, including seeking process aspects such as health-related beliefs, confidence in the health care system, disease frequency, pain tolerance, and presence of disability. This schematic succession of events is precisely what has allowed the study of health service use to exhibit different approaches, which in turn has led to the creation of various psychosocial and epidemiological models that have attempted to explain why the population does not use health services. From an economic perspective, the literature on health service utilization mainly considers two approaches: the traditional approach and the managerial approach. These provide different but complementary explanations regarding demand and investment in health services.
The traditional approach to demand for health services is based on consumer theory, where demand for medical services is mainly determined by the patient but conditioned by the health system. Within this emerging model, demand for health services is the result of a problem of inter-temporal utility maximization of the patient, and considered a function in the production of health.
The managerial approach, related to human capital theory, considers information asymmetries between doctor and patient regarding the type and quantity of necessary medical treatment. In this context, the decision making process can be divided into two parts: first, patients initially choose whether or not to seek treatment, and then, once the patient begins treatment, the physician determines the number of visits and use of services for tracking, monitoring, and controlling the damage that initially triggered the stages.
To specify a model of demand for medical services as a two part process, we should distinguish, at each stage, «who makes the decisions?», and «what is the set of explanatory variables?» Describing the initial demand for medical services should be considered an approach that reflects the patient’s decision to visit the doctor. The economic models elucidate this decision as the explanatory variables arise from the need to demand or investment, i.e. the doctor chooses the treatment considering not only medical criteria, but also economic incentives.
Both processes can be assumed to have the same set of explanatory variables, but the explanation may differ depending on the stage of the decision-making process being analyzed, the type of coverage, the service availability, and the provider’s behavior. In this article, each one of the above phases is examined from different perspectives, describing the conditions and determinants of the process of search and use of health services and making a crossanalysis for each model reviewed in a contingency matrix.
Finally, a comprehensive analysis of the models is proposed as a starting point for finding a model that allows, in a trans-disciplinary way, to elucidate a better explanation of the determinants and constraints of the process of search and use of health services.


REFERENCES

  1. Trías J. Determinantes de la utilización de los servicios de salud: Documento de Trabajo # 51, Buenos Aires, mayo 2004;22-36.

  2. Nájera P et al. Bases conceptuales y metodológicas de la Encuesta Nacional de Salud II, México, 1994. Salud Pública Méx 1998;40(1):76-85.

  3. MacKinlay J. Social network influences on morbid episodes and the career of help seeking behavior. En: Eisenberg L, Kleinman A (ed.). The relevance of social science for medicine. Holanda: Reidel Publishing, 1981:78-89.

  4. Donabedian A. Organización de la atención médica: el proceso de utilización de servicios de salud. Mexico, DF: Fondo de Cultura Económica; 1988; pp. 65-82.

  5. Hurd MD, McGarry K. Medical insurance and the use of health care services by the elderly. J Health Economics, 1997;16:129-154.

  6. Giovagnoli P, Busso M. Aspectos de la demanda por servicios de salud. IADB 2009;168-73.

  7. Rosenstock JM. Why people use health services (part two). Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 1986;44(3):385-393.

  8. Green C, Pope C. Effects of hearing impairment on use of health services among the elderly. J Aging Health 2001;13(issue 3):315-30.

  9. Priego H, López J, Meneses JL. Encuesta de consumo-utilización de servicios de salud. Tabasco vol. 12, ISBN 968-7991-17-8, 2009:1-57.

  10. Dossier N. Expert medical decisions in occupational medicine: a sociological analysis of medical judegement. Sociology Health Illness 1994;16(4):489-414.

  11. Fielder H. A review of the Literature on access and utilization of medical care. Soc Sci Med 1981;21(15):129-142.

  12. Liu X, Sturm R, Cuffel B. The impact of prior authorization on outpatient utilization in managed behavioral health planth medical care. Research Review 2000;57(issue 2):182-96.

  13. Kipp W, Kamugisha J, Jacobs P, Burnham G, Rubaale T. User fees, health staff incentives, and service utilization in Kabarole District, Uganda. Bulletin World Health Organization. 2009; Working paper No. 1, 79:10-32.

  14. Good B. Medical anthropology and the problem of belief. En: Medicine, rationality, and experience: an anthropological perspective. Cambridge: Camb Univ Press; 1994; pp. 3-24.

  15. Canales M, Almada B, Navarro R. La mortalidad en una población rural en México y su relación con el uso de los servicios médicos antes de la muerte. Sal Púb Méx 1984;26(4):404-414.

  16. Selwyn J. An epidemiological approach to the study of users and nonusers of child health services. Am J Public Health 1988;68(3):231-236.

  17. Arredondo A, Nájera P, Leyva R. Atención ambulatoria en México: el costo para usuarios. Sal Pub de México 1999;41(1):45-53.

  18. Steinbrook R. Medical journals and medical reporting. New Eng J Med 2000;342(22):1668-71.

  19. Guevara J, Lozano P, Wickizer T, Mell, L, Gephart H. Cost of health care services for children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder 2001;108(issue 1):71.

  20. Institue of Medicine. Health and behavior: The interplay of biological, behavioral, and societal influences. Committee on health and behavior: Research, practice and policy, board on neuroscience and behavioral health, US. 2002; pp. 34-56.

  21. Stiffman A, Striley C, Horvath V, Hadley I et al. Organizational context and provider perception as determinants of mental health service use. J Behavioral Health Services Research 2001;28(issue 2):188-112.

  22. Arredondo A, Orozco E. Consideraciones sobre la oferta y la demanda de los servicios de salud. En: Introducción a la economía de los servicios de salud. CIESS-isbn: 968-6748-39-3;2009:139-152.

  23. Tanner L. Predicting physician utilization in medical care. Health Services Research 1983;20(3):263-269.

  24. Krieger N. A glossary for social epidemiology. J Epidemiol Community Health 2001;55:693-700.

  25. Mechanic D. Sociological dimensions of illness behavior. Soc Sci Medicine 1995,41(9):1207-1216.

  26. Anda E. Lineamientos teóricos sobre la demanda de los servicios de salud. Ministerio Centro de Estudios y Asesoría en Salud. Quito, Ecuador: CEAS ed.; 2006; pp. 66-81.

  27. Williams S. Sociological imperialism and the profession of medicine. Sociological Health Illness 2001;23(2):135-158.

  28. Centro de Estudios y Asesoría en Salud. Demanda y utilización de servicios en salud y trabajo. Anuales de la Universidad de Cuenca. CEAS Ed.; Tomo VII; 2007; pp. 87-99.

  29. Iriart C, Elias E, Waitzkin H. Managed care in Latin America the new comun sense in health policy reform. Soc Sci Medicine 2001;52(8):1243-1254.

  30. Feldstein P. Hospital costs and utilization. En: Health Care Economics. New York: De. Wiley Medical; 2006; pp. 193-151.

  31. Parada I, Hernández P, Arredondo A. Financiamiento en programas de farmacodependencia en México: 1990-1994. Sal Pub Mex 2000;42(2): 118-125.

  32. Parker G. Robert L. Health care expenditures in a rural india community. Soc Sci Med 1986;21(5):23-27.

  33. Phelps Ch, Newhouse J. Coinsurance and the demand for medical care services. Paper No. R-964, OEO/NYC, Santa Mónica, USA: Rand. Corp.; 2006; pp. 82-111.

  34. Scheffler R, Zhang A, Snowden L. The impact of realignment on utilization and cost of community-based mental health services in California. Adm Policy Ment Health 2001;29(2):129-43.

  35. Acton Jan Paul, Nonmonetary factors in the demand for medical services. J Political Economy 1975;(83):595-613.

  36. Miners L. The familys demand for health a rural investigation. Ph. D. dissertation. University of North Caroline at Chapel Hill. Citado en: Akin A. The demand for primary health services in the third worl. New Jersy: Rowman and Allanheld Ed.; 2008; pp. 65-81.

  37. Leibowitz A, Friedman B. Family requests and the derived demand for health care. Citado en Akin A., op. cit.; 2008; pp. 96-114.

  38. Arredondo A, Orozco E, Abis Duperval P, Cuadra M et al. Temas selectos en sistemas de salud: Costos, financiamiento, equidad y gobernanza. Univ Aut de Yucatán; ISBN: 968-7019-16-6. 2009;198-206.

  39. Finkelstein M. Do factors other than need determine utilization of physicians ´ services in Ontario? Canadian Medical Association J 2001; 9/ 4/, Vol. 165 Issue 5:565-66.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Salud Mental. 2010;33