medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Cirugía Pediátrica

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2010, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Cir Pediatr 2010; 17 (2)

Transillumination esophagomyotomy by video-assisted endoscopy An option for caustic esophageal stricture dilation therapy persistent

Ortega-Salgado JA, Espinosa-Rosas P, Mundo-Alegría AX
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 11
Page: 90-94
PDF size: 326.30 Kb.


Key words:

Esophagus, Caustic stenosis, Esophageal stenosis.

ABSTRACT


Introduction: Restore the continuity of the digestive tract in caustic esophageal stenosis is a surgical challenge. Preserve the native esophagus trough the prolonged use of dilatation therapy can present complications such as esophageal disorders in feeding, dysphagia, jaw problems, joint and dental disease. The best substitute of esophagus is the colon, but it carries a high morbidity such as anastomotic leakage, fistula, necrosis, perforation, stenosis, redundancy of interposed colon, bleeding, gastrocolonic reflux and others. The esophageal myotomy have been described for the management of achalasia, but we found not reports if it’s use in caustic esophageal stenosis.
Case report: The case report a child with two esophageal caustic stenosis who not responded to the dilatation program therapy, a double myotomy was performed through right posterolateral thoracotomy with videoendoscopy esophagic transillumination to locate the two stenosis areas, during the procedure. The clinical and endoscopic follow up with adequate response.
Discusión: Esophageal rescue by this procedure improves the quality of life and has no the morbidity of colonic transposition. The patient monitoring by endoscopic control could effort the diagnosis of esophageal cancer risk. We think that clinical, radiographic and endoscopic response was adequate so, need more cases to asses whether this may be part of a new therapeutic option.


REFERENCES

  1. German JC, Waterston DJ. Colon interposition for replacement of the esophagus in children. J Pediatr Surg 1976; 11:227-233.

  2. Kelly JP, Shackeldford JD, Roper CL. Esophageal replacement with colon in children: functional results and long term growth. Ann Thorac Surg 1983; 36:634:642.

  3. Hendren WH, Hendren WG. Colon interposition: a modification of the Waterston’s technique using the normal esophageal route. J Pediatr Surg 1982: 6:3-9.

  4. Mithcehll MI, Geth DW, Roberts KD, Abrams LD. Colon Interposition in children. Br J Surg 1989; 76: 681-686.

  5. Valente A, Brereton RJ. Esophageal replacement with hole stomach in infants and children. J Pediatr Surg 1987 Oct; 22(10) 913-7.

  6. Tomado de: http://www.tefvater.org/esophageal/ historyofesophagealreplacement.html

  7. Arul Parkh. Oesophageal Replacementu In Children. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2008; 90: 7–12.

  8. Ahmad SA, Sylvester KG, Hebra A, et al: Esophageal replacement using the colon: Is it a good choice? J Pediatr Surg Aug; 31(8):1026-30.

  9. Patti Marco G, et al: Laparoscopic heller myotomy and dor fundoplication for esophageal achalasia in children Journal of Pediatric Surgery 2001; 36(8): 1248-1251.

  10. Alvarez A. Stricture of esophagus complicated by carcinoma. Can J Sur 1963; 6: 470-6.

  11. Klinmann J. Carcinoma of the esophageal after lye corrosion. Acta Chir Scan 1968; 134: 489-453




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Cir Pediatr. 2010;17