medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Urología

Organo Oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Urología
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2010, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Urol 2010; 70 (2)

Urethroplasty as urethral stricture treatment at the Hospital Universitario Dr. José Eleuterio González; Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico

Esteban-María J, Mendoza-Lucio L
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 11
Page: 79-83
PDF size: 533.62 Kb.


Key words:

stricture, urethroplasty, splint, anastomosis, graft, Mexico.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Not until the second half of the twentieth century did urethroplasty come into use, based on the work of the English urologist Richard Turner Warwick, taking the place of urethral dilatation, first described in India in 600 B.C.
Materials and methods: Urethroplasty treatment results in 28 patients with complicated urethral stricture are presented. Patients underwent urethroplasty at the Urology Service of the Hospital Universitario in Monterrey, Mexico, within the time frame of March 2005-2008. The following techniques were used: stricture zone excision and end-toend anastomosis in those patients with posterior urethral stricture of 1 cm or less in length; two-stage Johanson technique or the application of buccal mucosa graft in one or two stages was used in patients with stricture larger than 1 cm or with anterior urethral stricture.
Results: The most common complications were recurrent urethral stricture and urethrocutaneous fistula. Intraurethral splints (Urolumen™) were applied in 3 patients due to recurrent stricture. Total success rate was 67%.


REFERENCES

  1. Attawater HL. The history of urethral stricture Br J Urol 1943;15:39-51.

  2. Heyns CF, Steenkamp JW, De Kock ML. Treatment of male urethral strictures: is repeated dilation or internal urethrotomy useful? J Urol 1999;161(5):1583.

  3. Turner-Warwick RT. A technique for posterior urethroplasty, J Urol 1960;83:416-419.

  4. Morin Rangel MJ, Esteban Maria J. Trócar de cistotomía HU. Rev Mex de Urol 2004;64(2):67-70.

  5. Andrich DE, Mundy AR. Urethral strictures and their surgical treatment. BJU Int 2000;86(5):571-580.

  6. Martínez Piñeiro JA. Cirugía uretral. Actas Urol Esp 2002;26:624-634.

  7. Johanson B. Reconstruction of the male urethra in strictures. Acta Chir Scand 1953; 176(Suppl):1.

  8. Dubey D, Kumar A, Mandhani A. Buccal mucosal urethroplasty: a versatile technique for all urethral segments. BJU Int 2005;95(4):625-629.

  9. De Vocht TF, van Venrooij GE, Boon TA. Self-expanding stent insertion for urethral strictures: a 10-year follow-up. BJU Int 2003;91(7):627-630.

  10. Serrano EA, Camacho JC, Moreno AJ. Uso del Urolumen™ como alternativa en el tratamiento de la estenosis de la uretra bulbar recidivante y de la hiperplasia prostática obstructiva en pacientes de alto riesgo quirúrgico. Gac Med Mex 2003;139:435-448.

  11. Atala A. Experimental and clinical experience with tissue engineering techniques for urethral reconstruction. Urol Clin North Am 2002;29(2);485-492.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Urol. 2010;70