medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Medicina Interna de México

Colegio de Medicina Interna de México.
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2010, Number 6

<< Back Next >>

Med Int Mex 2010; 26 (6)

Start early dialysis after soft catheter placement as a risk factor for dysfunction and reduction of the effectiveness of peritoneal dialysis

García CE, Elizalde BCI, Lozano NJJ
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 16
Page: 552-560
PDF size: 399.93 Kb.


Key words:

early dialysis, soft cathete, a risk factor, dysfunction, effectiveness, peritoneal diálisis.

ABSTRACT

Background: Chronic kidney disease is a disease with high incidence in Mexico.
Material and methods: We performed a cohort study which assessed the catheter dysfunction, effectiveness, start time, balance dialysis, potassium baseline, baseline creatinine, urea basal, potassium at the end of dialysis, creatinine at the end of dialysis, urea end of dialysis and hemoglobin. The study included patients with chronic renal failure without previous catheters, without peritonitis, without obesity and Mexicans over 18 years. 60 patients were divided into two groups. Group 1: patients with onset of dialysis at 0 hours after the catheter. Group 2: patients with onset of dialysis at 12 hours after the catheter.
Results: The average age for group 1 was 46.47 and 48.40 group 2 years. Of all patients 45% were men and 55% female. insuficiencia renal crónica as a cause of diabetes mellitus was obtained in 53.3%, hypertension in 40% and others 6.66%. Urea with an average of 254.9 in the group of zero-hour and 12-hour group the average was 255.7 urea. Urea at the end of dialysis spare parts in the group of zero-hour was an average of 150.7 and 12-hour group the average was 162.7. The average initial creatinine in the group of zero-hour was 17.9 and the group of 12 hours was 16.8. Creatinine at the end of dialysis in the group of zero-hour was 10.8 and 12 hours group, the average was 10.39. The initial potassium group was 6.14 zero hour and 12 hours group average was 6.2. Potassium at the end of dialysis in the group of zero hours was 4.19 and the 12-hour group was 4.3. The p calculated by t test of measured variables was as follows: age p 0359, water balance p 0296, p 0300 TAS, TAD 0029, initial creatinine, p 0254, 0961 initial urea, creatinine at the end of dialysis p 0557 , end of dialysis urea p 0259, p 0781 initial potassium, potassium final p 0544, p 0241 initial hemoglobin, albumin, p 0582, p 0535 glucose. They conducted chi square to the variables the following results: for creatinine X2 0.16, x Manthelan of 0159, relative risk 1.18. Urea: 1.17 X2, x Manthelan 1.15, 2.25 and RR 1.58 RM. Potassium: 0.57 X2, x Manthelan 0.56, OR 1.8 and 1.38 RR.
Conclusions: The time must wait after placing a soft catheter, either at 0 hours or twelve hours later, does not increase the risk of catheter dysfunction or influence the effectiveness of dialysis.


REFERENCES

  1. Lankisch P, Tonnis H, Fernández E. Use of Tenckhoff Catheter for Peritoneal Dialysis in Terminal Renal Failure. British Medical Journal 22 december 1973.

  2. Devine H, Oreopulous D, Izatt S, et al. The permanent Tenckhoff catheter for chronic peritoneal dialysis. CMA Journal 1975;113.

  3. Nicholson M, Donnelly P, Veitch P, et al. Factors influencing peritoneal catheter survival in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 1990;72:368-372.

  4. Wiggins K, Johnson D, Craig J, et al. Treatment of Peritoneal Dialysis-Associated Peritonitis: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. American Journal of Kidney Diseases 2007;50(6):967-988.

  5. Finan P, Guillou P. Experience with surgical implantation of catheters for continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 1985;67.

  6. Aakash H. Peritoneal dialysis catheters: laparoscopic versus traditional placement techniques and outcomes. The American Journal of Surgery 2007;194:872-887.

  7. Francis D. Technical Notes and Tips: Inserting Peritoneal Dialysis Catheters without Special Instruments. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2008;90(2):163-164.

  8. Paul M. Reimbursement and economic factors influencing dialysis modality choice around the world. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008;23(7):2365-2373.

  9. Tangri N, Ansell D, Naimark D, et al. Predicting technique survival in peritoneal dialysis patients: comparing artificial neural networks and logistic regression. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008;23(9):2972.

  10. Hayriye T. Effect of glucose concentration on peritoneal inflammatory cytokines in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients. Mediators Inflamm 2004;13(2):119-121.

  11. Sociedad Española de Nefrología. Guías de Práctica Clínica en Diálisis Peritoneal, 2005.

  12. Doñate T. Guías de diálisis peritoneal y la práctica diaria. Nefrología 2005;25:S2.

  13. II NKF-K/DOQI. Clinical practice guidelines for peritoneal dialysis adequacy: update 2000. Am J Kidney Dis 2001;37(Suppl 1):S65-S136.

  14. Daugirdas J. Manual de diálisis peritoneal. 4a ed. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2008.

  15. Avendaño H. Nefrología clínica. 2a ed. México: Panamericana, 2003.

  16. Brook N, White S, Waller J, et al. The surgical management of peritoneal dialysis catheters. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2004;86:190-195.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Med Int Mex. 2010;26