medigraphic.com
Órgano Oficial del Instituto de Ciencias de la Salud, Hospital Escuela y Facultad de Medicina-Xalapa

2002, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Med UV 2002; 2 (2)

Una prueba como rutina de consultorio en embarazadas con factores diabéticos de riesgo

Pérez CP, Mendoza CL, Coronel-Brizio P

Language: Spanish
References: 20
Page: 19-23
PDF size: 134.48 Kb.


ABSTRACT

This study was carried out to verify the utility and simplicity of a method consisting of administering to pregnant women with associated risk factors. 50gr of oral glucose without fasting or any special schedule and, at the same time, to investigate the incidence of gestational diabetes in our population under study due to the fact that there are no previous studies on this respect. This test, which we will call “test I”, was applied to 103 pregnant women between 26 and 28 weeks of gestational age, from which 11 resulted with capillary glicemia of 140 mg or more. To this 11 women, the usual test for determining oral glucose tolerance (100gr), here called “test II” was conduct by determining their glucose level without breakfast and after 60, 120 and 180 minutes. From these, 8 cases of gestational diabetes were diagnosed, all of them with risk factors. It is concluded that, due to its simplicity and usefulness of the “test I” and it is proposed that it should be applied as a test of routine use in the proces s of monitoring pregnant women with associated risk factors.


REFERENCES

  1. Instituto Nacional de Perinatología. Diabetes Mellitus y embarazo. Normas y procedimientos de Obstetricia y ginecología. 1999; 37-49

  2. Mateo S.H y Espinoza de los Monteros M.A Diabetes Mellitus y embarazo. Rev de Perinatología 1992; (7): 22-35

  3. Grupo de Estudios sobre diabetes. Revista Méd IMSS. 1992; 30: 35-38

  4. Zuñiga S. Diabetes y embarazo. Ginecología y Obstetricia de México 1998; 66 (6): 221-226

  5. 5.Espinoza de los Monteros M.A. Ramírez T.A. Diabetes y embarazo. J.G.H. Editores 1999;113-118

  6. Sandoval T, Jiménez G y col. Morbimortalidad perinatal en mujeres con diabetes mellitus y embarazo. Ginec Obst de México 1995; 63 (4): 181-85

  7. 7.Adams MK et al. Sequelae of unrecognized gestational diabetes. Am Obstet Gynecol 1998;178: 321-33

  8. 8.Magee S. Walden C.E Influence of diagnostic criteria on the incidence of gestational diabetes y perinatal morbidity. JAMA 1993; 126 269: 606-615

  9. Normas y Procedimientos de Neonatología. Inst Nal de Perinat 1998; 53-55

  10. Bolaños A y col. Análisis de la prueba de 50 gr de glucosa. Instituto N. de Perinatología. Ginec Obst de México 1997; 65 (1): 52-55

  11. Sullivan B.A. et al. Gestational diabetes. J Am Pharm Assoc 1998; 38: 346-71

  12. Kvetny M et al. Results for screening for gestational diabetes mellitus in a Danish county . Dan. Med. Bull 1999; 46 (1): 57-59

  13. 13.Moses R. et al. The extent of undiagnosed gestational diabetes mellitus in New Spoth Wales Med Aut 1997; 167: 14-6

  14. Damm P. Gestational diabetes mellitus and subsequent development of overt diabetes mellitus. Dan Med Bull 1998; 455: 495-509

  15. Lemmen M.D. Thomas H. et al. Screening for gestational diabetes mellitus in adolescent pregnants. Am J Obstet-Gynecol 1998; 1251-1256

  16. 0 Sullivan B. Mahan C.M Screening criteria for high risk gestational diabetes patients Am. J 1973; 895-899

  17. Carr S.R. Screening for gestational diabetes. A perspective. Diabetes Care 1998;21. Supl. 2 B 14-8.

  18. Bonomo M et al. Which cutoff level used in screening for glucose intolerance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 179 (1): 179-185

  19. 19.Cetin M. Cetin A. Time dependent gestational diabetes screen values. In. J Gynaecol Obstet 1997; 56 (3 ): 257-261

  20. Dillon et al. Glucometer analysis of one hour glucosa challenger samples. Am. J. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 1120-1124




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com