medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista ADM Órgano Oficial de la Asociación Dental Mexicana

ISSN 0001-0944 (Print)
Órgano Oficial de la Asociación Dental Mexicana
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2010, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev ADM 2010; 67 (3)

Low shrink posterior resin restorative

Cedillo VJJ
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 9
Page: 137-142
PDF size: 800.74 Kb.


Key words:

resin, contraction, stress, silorane.

ABSTRACT

In recent years, major improvements have been made in composite resins, primarily with regard to inorganic fillers, whilst the actual chemical structure of the organic resin matrix has remained unaltered since the work of Bowen in the 1960´s. Virtually all resins employ methacrylates, such as TEGDMA, Bis-GMA or UDMA, which undergo dimensional change during polymerization.
Shrinkage from polymerization, which results in stress at the dentin-resin interface, continues to be a drawback of these materials, the only attempt to overcome this being through the employment of a technique that involves adding the resin gradually.
The Filtek™P90 resin matrix is non-methacrylate based, a fact which reduces shrinkage during curing. Based on silorane chemistry and its ring-opening monomers, this particular resin results in a marked reduction in shrinkage. The addition of silorane as the resin matrix is a direct solution for clinics thanks to its lower shrinkage rate. This article presents a clinical case study involving the use of this resin.


REFERENCES

  1. N Ilie and R. Hickel. Silorane-based Dental Composite: Behavior and Abilities. Dental Material Journal (2006) 25:445-454.

  2. Rodriguez VI y Martins Alho M, Abate PF. Nueva matriz orgánica con menor contracción de polimerización. Rev Asoc Odontol Argent. 2004;92:361-6.

  3. Watts DC and Wahbi MA. Shrinkage-Stress Kinetics of Silorane versus Dimetha Resin-Composites. IADR 2005, Baltimore, U.S.A., Abstract # 2680.

  4. Ilie N E. Jelen and Hickel R. Low Shrinkage composite for dental application. IADR 2007, New Orleans, U.S.A., Abstract # 0398.

  5. Weinmann, W, Thalacker C and Guggenberger R. Siloranes in Dental Composites. Dental Materials (2005) 21, 68-74.

  6. Fischer J and Stawarczyk B. Adhesion of P90 System Adhesive to Enamel and Dentin. Unpublished data.

  7. Yamazaki, PCV, Bedran-Russo AKB, Pereira PNR and Swift EJ Jr. Microleakage Evaluation of a New Low-Shrinkage Composite Restorative Material. Operative Dentistry, 2006, 31-6, 670-676.

  8. Dr. Roberto Espinosa. Adaptación marginal de la resina compuesta Filtek™ P90 a las paredes internas de la cavidad; Análisis in Vitro. Espertise™.

  9. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J. Dent. Res. 66 (11): 1636-9. 1987.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev ADM. 2010;67