medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Gaceta Médica de México

ISSN 0016-3813 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2011, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Gac Med Mex 2011; 147 (2)

The 2010 curriculum of the Faculty of Medicine at the National University of Mexico

Sánchez-Mendiola M, Durante-Montiel I, Morales-López S, Lozano-Sánchez R, Martínez-González A, Graue-Wiechers E
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 9
Page: 152-158
PDF size: 112.12 Kb.


Key words:

Curriculum, Competency based education, Organizational change, Leadership, Undergraduate medical education.

ABSTRACT

The 2010 undergraduate medical degree curriculum at the faculty of medicine of the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM) constitutes an important curricular reform of medical education in our country. It is the result of an institutional reflective process and academic dialog, which culminated in its approval by UNAM’s Academic Council for the Biology, Chemistry, and Health Sciences areas on February 2nd, 2010.
Some distinguishing characteristics of the new academic curriculum are: organization by courses with a focus on outcome competencies; three curricular axes that link three knowledge areas; four educational phases with achievement profiles; new courses (biomedical informatics, basic-clinical and clinical-basic integration, among others); and core curriculum. The aforementioned curriculum was decided within a framework of effective teaching strategies, competency oriented learning assessment methods, restructuring of the training of teaching staff, and establishment of a curriculum committee follow-up and evaluation of the program.
Curricular change in medical education is a complex process through which the institution can achieve its mission and vision. This change process faces challenges and opportunities, and requires strategic planning with long-term foresight to guarantee a successful dynamic transition for students, teachers, and for the institution itself.


REFERENCES

  1. Primera Comisión Revisora del Plan de Estudios. Panel Foro Nueva Orientación del Plan de Estudios de la Carrera de Médico Cirujano en la Facultad de Medicina en la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, en el Primer Congreso Académico Dr. Roberto Kretschmer Schmid; 2005 abril 20-22; Facultad de Medicina, UNAM. México.

  2. Piña-Garza E, González-Carbajal E, López-Bárcena JJ, et al. Fundamentación académica para la elaboración de un plan de estudios de medicina en México. Gac Méd Méx. 2008;144:189-97.

  3. Plan de Estudios 2010 y Programas Académicos de la Licenciatura de Médico Cirujano. Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 2010. Disponible en: www.facmed.unam.mx.

  4. Wolf A. Competence Based Assessment. Buckingham: Open University Press; 1995.

  5. Proyecto Tuning. http://unideusto.org/tuning/, consultada el 4 de noviembre de 2010.

  6. Core Committee, Institute for International Medical Education. Global minimum essential requirements in medical education. Med Teach. 2002;24:130-5.

  7. ACGME Outcome Project. http://www.acgme.org/Outcome/, consultada el 4 de noviembre de 2010.

  8. Abreu LF, Cid A, Herrera G, et al. Perfil por competencias del médico general mexicano. Asociación Mexicana de Facultades y Escuelas de Medicina, México; 2008.

  9. Harden R, Crosby J, Davis M. AMEE Guide N.o 14: Outcome based education: Part I - An introduction to outcome-based education. Med Teach. 1999;21:7-14.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Gac Med Mex. 2011;147