medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Médica de Costa Rica y Centroamérica

Colegio de Medicos y Cirujanos República de Costa Rica
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2009, Number 589

<< Back Next >>

Rev Med Cos Cen 2009; 66 (589)

Diagnóstico radiológico de apendicitis aguda

Rodríguez AD, Araya SC
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page: 251-253
PDF size: 261.50 Kb.


Key words:

No keywords

ABSTRACT

Appendicitis is the acute inflammation of the appendix. The main cause is the obstruction of the appendiceal lumen by fecal matter impact or lymphatic nodule hyperplasia. It’s the most common cause of emergency abdominal surgery. It’s more frequent in countries with a diet low in fiber, males, children and young adults. Clinical history includes hyporexia, periumbilical or epigastric colic-type pain that irradiates to the right iliac fossa, fever and vomit. Found at physical examination are Blumberg’s sign, the McBurney point sign, Rovsing’s sign, the psoas sign and the obturator sign. Laboratory findings include leucocytosis, neutrophilia and protein C reactive increase. Atypical presentations are found in 20%-30% of patients. Diagnosis can be made based on clinical history and physical examination, however, it can be problematic. That’s why, US and helical CT have become the radiologic studies of choice in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Compressive US is the initial radiologic study of choice in children, child-bearing age and pregnant women. Thin-section contrast helical CT is the definitive radiologic study of choice for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Definitive treatment is appendectomy and prophylactic treatment is realized with broad spectrum IV antibiotics. Prognosis is excellent, however, it continues to be an emergency and can lead to death, whereby every patient must be studied.


REFERENCES

  1. Beasley S. Can We Improve Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis?. Br Med J, Oct 2000, 321:907-908.

  2. Bendeck S, et al. Imaging for Suspected Appendicitis: Negative Appendectomy and Perforation Rates. Radiology, Oct 2002, 225(1):131-136.

  3. Birnhaum B, Wilson S. Appendicitis at the Millennium. Radiology, May 2000, 215(2):337-348.

  4. Bratton S, et al. Acute Appendicitis Risks of Complication: Age and Medicaid Insurance. Pediatrics, Jul 2000, 106(1):75-78.

  5. Craig S. Appendicitis, Acute. eMedicine. 26 May 2005.

  6. Ege G, et al. Diagnostic Value of Unenhanced Helical CT in Adult Patients With Suspected Acute Appendicitis. Br J Radiol, Sep 2002, 75:721-725.

  7. Incesu L, et al. Acute Appendicitis: MR Imaging and Sonographic Correlation. Am J Roengenol, Mar 1997, 168:669-674.

  8. Incesu L. Appendicitis. Medicine. 10 Jun 2004.

  9. Rao P, et al. Helical Computed Tomography in Differentiating Appendicitis and Acute Gynecologic Conditions. Obstet Gynecol, Mar 1999, 93(3):417-421

  10. Santacroce L. Appendicitis. Medicine. 15 Jun 2005.

  11. See T, et al. Appendicitis: Spectrum of Appearances on Helical CT. Br J Radiol, Sep 2002, 75:775-781.

  12. Sivit C, et al. When Appendicitis is Suspected in Children. Radiographics, Jan 2001, 21(1):247-262.

  13. Terasawa T, et al. Systematic Review: Computed Tomography and Ultrasonography to Detect Acute Appendicitis in Adults and Adolescents. Ann Intern Med, Oct 2004, 141(7):537-553.

  14. Wijetunga R, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Focused Appendiceal CT in Clinically Equivocal Cases of Acute Appendicitis. Radiology, Dec 2001, 221(3):747-753.

  15. Wong C, et al. Diagnosis of Appendicitis: Imaging Findings in Patients With Atypical Clinical Features. Am J Roentgenol, Dec 1993, 161:1199-1203.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Med Cos Cen. 2009;66