medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Anales de Radiología, México

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2009, Number 2

<< Back

Anales de Radiología México 2009; 8 (2)

Utilidad diagnóstica de la urotomografía en pacientes con hematuria

Martínez RM, Ayala GF, Cuevas GJE, Cruz AA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page: 183-193
PDF size: 289.60 Kb.


Key words:

Hematuria, Computed Tomography, Urotomography, CT scan, Urography, Excretory Urography, Multiplanar Reconstruction, Maximum Projection Intensity (MPI), Three dimensional (3D).

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Hematuria can be well evaluated with Computed Tomography combining non contrasted phase, contrasted and of excretion phase.
Previously, excretory urography was the diagnostic imaging method of choice for the urinary evaluation. However, it has limitations, so that diagnostic complementary imaging methods are required.
Objective: This study suggests that Urotomography substitutes for the imaging diagnosis of different pathological entities miscontributing factors of hematuria to the Excretory Urography, since simultaneously it allows at the same time the evaluation of abdominal and retroperitoneal structures and decreases the need of complementary studies considerably.
Material and method: 39 patients with hematuria were evaluated with Helicoid Tomography of simple phase nephrographic and elimination (Urotomography). At a later time, Multiplanar, 3D, excretory phase MIP reconstructions were performed.
Results: Of the 39 evaluated patients, only 35 patients, this is, 89.6% showed findings related with urinary tract, two (5.12%) were normal. Of the study group 11 patients (28.16%) presented additional findings not related with urinary tract.
Discussion: Urotomography was useful for diagnosing 89.6% of the patients evaluated by hematuria.
Conclusion: Urotomography is a useful method in the search of hematuria-conditioning factors


REFERENCES

  1. Kawashima A, Vrtiska TJ, LeRoy AJ, Hartman RP, Mc CollounghCH, KingBF. CT Urography RadioGraphis 2004; 24: S35-S54.

  2. JoffeS, Servaes S, Okon S, Horowitz M. Multi-detector row CT urography in the evaluation ofhematuria Radiographics 2003; 23: 1441-55.

  3. Edwar JY, Maxwell VM, Peter RC. Evaluation of the patient with hematuria. Med Clin N Am 2004; 88: 329-43.

  4. Balcells A. La clínica y el laboratorio. 16a. Ed. Barcelona: Masson; 1993, p. 37-8.

  5. Grosfeld,Litwin, Wolf, et al Evaluation of asymptomatic microscopic hematuria in adults: the Amarican Urological Associtation best practice policy-part I: definition, detection, prevalence, and etiology, Urology 2001; 57: 599-603.

  6. Kassiske B, Keane WF. Hematuria. In: Brennner B (ed). The Kidney. 5th. Ed. Vol. 2. Philadelphia: Saunders Company; 1996, p. 1158-9.

  7. Glassock RJ. Hematuria. In: Masry SG, Lassock RJ (eds). Nefrologia. Vol. 1. Buenos Aires: Editorial Medica Panamericana; 1985, p. 450-62.

  8. Foley WD. Multidetector CT: abdominal Visceral Imaging. Radiographics 2002; 22: 710-19.

  9. Lockhart ME. Technical considerations in Renal CT. Radiol Clin N Am 2003; 41 (5).

  10. Harris AC, Zwirewich CV, Lyburm ID, Torreggiani WC, Marchinkow Lo. CT findings in blunt renal trauma. Radiographics 2001; 21: S201-S214.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Anales de Radiología México. 2009;8