Carrillo SC

Language: Spanish
References: 13
Page: 25-59
PDF size: 91.70 Kb.

ABSTRACT

The introduction into Dentistry of aesthetic materials for the restoration of posterior teeth has been preceded by misinformation. However, it has also been boosted thanks to the obvious match in color with the tooth structure and the improvement in their physical properties, as well as the knowledge of the possible toxicity that amalgam restorations may induce, due to their mercury content.
Composite resins are presented as materials that, once hardened, could give the erroneous impression of being totally inert and completely harmless.
It is important to consider the possibility of these materials causing damage, and to understand the characteristics of components that can produce harmful and/or allergic reactions either when recently placed or during the aging process of the restorations.

REFERENCES

1. Bowen R. Properties of a silica-reinforced polymer for dental restorations. JADA 1963; 66:71-8.

2. Phillips RW. Past, present and future of composite resin systems. Den Clin of North America. 1981; 25 (2) p. 209-218

3. Carrillo C y Monroy M. Fotopolimerización Parte I. Materiales de Resina Compuesta y su polimerización. Revista ADM 2009: 65 (4);10-17

4. Phillips RW. Changing trends of dental restorative materials. Dent. Clin. Of NorthAmerica. 1989; 33 (2) p. 202-215

5. Monroy-Pedraza A M. Fotopolimerización de Resinas. Tesis de Licenciatura. Facultad de Odontología. Universidad Intercontinental, Tlalpan, D.F., 2010

6. Phillips RW, Avery DR, Mehra R, Swartz, ML, McCune, RJ. Observation on a composite resin for class II restorations: A three year report. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1973;30:891-7

7. Soderholm KJ, Mariotti A. Bis-GMA based resins in dentistry: Are they safe? JADA 1999;130:201-9.

8. Eliades G, Eliades T, Vavuranakis M. General aspects of biomaterialsurface alterations following exposure to biologic fluids. In: Eliades G, Eliades T, Brantley W. Dental Materials in Vivo. Aging and related phenomena. Section I (Overview), Chicago, Quintessence publishing Co. 2003 pp 3-20

9. Gregson K, O’Neill T, Platt J., Windsor, J. In vitro induction of hydrolytic activity in human gingival and pulpal fibroblast by triethylene glycol dimethacrylate and monocyte chemotatic protein – 1. Dent. Mater. 2008;24 (1):1-7.

10. Soderholm KJ. Degradation mechanisms of dental resin composites. In: Eliades G, Eliades T, Brantley W.:Dental Materials in Vivo. Aging and related phenomena. Section III, Chicago, Quintessence publishing Co. 2003 pp 99-12

11. Gregson K, Beinswanger A, Platt, J. The impact of sorption, buffering and proteins on leaching of organic and inorganic substances from dental resin core material. J. of Biomedical Mater. Res. 2007; 48 (4) :256-264.

12. Soderholm KJ, Richards ND. Wear resistance of composites: A solved problem? Gen. Dent. 1998; 46:256-63.

13. Whitworth JM, Myers PM, Smith J, Wall AW, McCabe JF. Endodontic complications after plastic restorations in general practice. Int. Endodontic J. 2005;38:409-16.