medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Ginecología y Obstetricia de México

Federación Mexicana de Ginecología y Obstetricia, A.C.
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2011, Number 08

<< Back Next >>

Ginecol Obstet Mex 2011; 79 (08)

Rating the quality of care offered to women who underwent hysterectomy

Rosales AE, Jaime CMJ
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page: 474-481
PDF size: 517.20 Kb.


Key words:

quality of care, hysterectomy.

ABSTRACT

Background: In recent years emerged as a primary need, the evaluation of the services offered to get better quality in them. Health systems are subject to these assessments.
Objective: To assess the quality of care provided to patients who underwent hysterectomy, since the reference of the family physician, until discharge by the gynecologist. We analyzed the diagnostic results in the short and long term, patient satisfaction and gynecologist satisfaction, regarding the conditions for offering services.
Patients and method: Retrospective study including 118 patients who underwent hysterectomy and were analyzed the following aspects: history, diagnoses and outcomes. Cross-sectional surveys were also conducted to obtain the satisfaction of patients and the physicians who performed the surgeries.
Results: The satisfaction of patients was confirmed, in contrast to the opinion of gynecologists who expressed dissatisfaction with the resources they have. There was discrepancy between diagnosis, planned surgery and the procedure performed, however, the clinical results were adequate.
Conclusions: At present, any institution should periodically evaluate the services it provides to implement measures and procedures commensurate with their population and resources and invite users to participate in internal decision making and provide the opportunity to become an evaluator to generate a culture of self-improvement and continuous improvement in all involved.


REFERENCES

  1. Loegering L, Reiter RC, Gambone JC. Valoración de la calidad en la atención médica. Clin Obst Ginec 1994;37:113-125.

  2. Aguirre GH. Evaluación de la calidad de atención médica. Sal Pub Mex 1990;32:170-178.

  3. Donabedian A. The quality of care, how can it be assessed? JAMA 1988;260:1743-1748.

  4. American College of Obstetrician and Gynecologists. Criteria sets in quality assurance in obstetrics and Gynecology. 1st ed. Washington: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 1989;13-43.

  5. Villet R, Salet-Lizee D. Hystérectomie par voie abdominale (pour lésions bénignes). En: Encycl. Méd. Chir. Techniques Chirurgicales. Urologie. Gynécologie 41600, Paris: Elsevier, 1995;18.

  6. Rosales AE, Jaime CMJ. Valor real del ultrasonido en ginecología. Ginecol Obstet Mex 1998;66:293-296.

  7. Fernández del Castillo SC. Histerectomía ginecológica. Conceptos actuales. Ginecol Obstet Mex 1999;67:349-352.

  8. Thompson JD. Histerectomía. En: Te Linde´s Operative Gynecology. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 1993;608-676.

  9. Mead PB. Infecciones posoperatorias. En: Te Linde´s Operative Gynecology. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 1993;187-198.

  10. Graham JM, Oshiro BT, Blanco JD. Cefalosporinas de espectro limitado. Clin Ginec Obst Temas Actuales 1992;19:441-450.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2011;79