medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Ginecología y Obstetricia de México

Federación Mexicana de Ginecología y Obstetricia, A.C.
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2011, Number 08

<< Back Next >>

Ginecol Obstet Mex 2011; 79 (08)

Cervical meningocele with filiform connection. Case report

Kerckoff-Villanueva HH, Bautista-Melgoza A, Rodríguez-Márquez DM
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 9
Page: 497-500
PDF size: 295.38 Kb.


Key words:

cervical meningocele, spina bifida or cystic open, defects of the neural tube, encefalodisrrafias.

ABSTRACT

The meningocele is the least common form of spina bifida cystica and represents less than 10% of cases of this disorder. A case of a female patient aged 26 with a history of two pregnancies and two previous cesarean sections, present pregnancy unplanned, uncontrolled during the first trimester prenatal and without supplementation with folic acid. Family history of consanguinity with her husband (second cousins) and psychomotor reassessed in four maternal cousins. The first follow-up visit the patient was at 34 weeks of pregnancy. The ultrasonographic findings were: cervical meningocele posterior filiform connection between the first and second cervical vertebrae, lateral ventriculomegaly and third and fourth ventricles and hydrocephalus secondary. Cesarean section was performed at 37 weeks gestation and was a newborn male 3.000 g, 52 cm, head circumference of 36 cm, Apgar 8/9, Capurro 37 weeks of gestation. In the posterior cervical region tumor was located a soft 5 x 5 cm with intact skin, adhered to deep planes. Movement of all four extremities without neurological involvement. He referred to the department of neurosurgery for shunt placement and subsequently performed surgical excision of the meningocele.


REFERENCES

  1. Nyberg DA, McGahan PJ, Proteirus HD, Pilu G. Diagnostic Imaging of fetal anomalies. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2003;256-267.

  2. Secretaría de Salud. El ácido fólico y la prevención de defectos al nacimiento. Folleto. México. 2003.

  3. Padilla E, Gissell A. Comportamiento clínico epidemiológico de los pacientes con defecto del tubo neural ingresados en el servicio de Neonatología del Hospital Infantil de Nicaragua Manuel de Jesús Rivera «La Mascota» periodo de julio 2009 a enero 2010. 1a ed. Nicaragua: Tesis de especialidad en Pediatría, 2010.

  4. Tarqui Mamani C. Incidencia de los defectos de tubo neural en el Instituto Nacional Materno Perinatal de Lima.1a ed. Chile. Revista Chilena de Salud Pública 2009;13(2):82-89.

  5. Praveen K, Barbara BK. Congenital malformations. Evidence-based evaluation and management. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2007;41-50.

  6. Tristch Timor I E, Cohen M. Neuroecografía prenatal y neonatal. Madrid: Marbán, 2004; 453-465.

  7. Wong JH, Wong GK, Zhu XL, Chan YL, Fung E, Poon WS. Cervical meningocele with tethered cervical cord in a Chinese infant. Hong Kong Med J 2005;11(2):113-115.

  8. Sharma V. Lateral Cervical Meningocele. Journal of Korean Medical Science 1992;7(2):179-183.

  9. Twining P. Anomalías fetales, diagnóstico ecográfico. Madrid: Marbán, 2002;144-155.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2011;79