medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Cirugía Plástica

ISSN 2992-8559 (Electronic)
ISSN 1405-0625 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • Policies
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

1999, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Cir Plast 1999; 9 (3)

Protruding ear: minimally invasive surgery

Cuenca-Guerra R
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 9
Page: 120-125
PDF size: 1041.59 Kb.


Key words:

Prominent ear, protruding ear, antihelix.

ABSTRACT

From Ely (1881) to Tramier (1997), surgery to correct prominent or protruding ears, or absence of the antihelix fold has had many modifications, yielding good to excellent results; however, the large incisions and massive dressing are uncomfortable for the patients. The goal of this paper is to present minimally invasive surgical technique to form and enhance the antihelix fold, reducing patient’s discomfort. Twenty patients who were 28 years old average were operated on, 18 bilateral and two unilateral. The surgical technique begins with an antihelix fold marking, infiltration with 2% lidocaine with epinephrine, an incision is done on the most cephalic edge of the helix, dissecting an anterior tunnel, weakening the anterior surface of the cartilage by scoring its surface, dissecting the posterior surface rasping the cartilage, thus making the antihelix fold, leaving the skin of the fold out side, and placing surgical fascia staples on the skin over the new fold to keep it in place. Two ears showed regression of 30-40%, one ear had epidermolysis with cartilage exposure which epithelized spontaneously, and the other patients were satisfied with the results. This technique is safe, simple, painless and easily reproductible in outpatient setting.


REFERENCES

  1. Ely ET. An operation for prominence of the auricles. Arch Otol 1881; 10: 97.

  2. Morestin H. De la reposition et du plissement cosmetiques du pavillon de l’oreille. Rev Orthop 1903; 14: 289.

  3. Luckett WH. A new operation for prominent ears based on the anatomy of the deformity. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1910; 10: 635.

  4. GibsonT. Davis, WB. The distortion of autogenous cartilage grafts: its cause and prevention. Br J Plast Surg 1958; 10: 257.

  5. Stenstrom SJ. A natural technique for correction of congenitally prominent ears. Plast Reconstr Surg 1963; 32: 509.

  6. Stenstrom SJ. A simple operation for prominent ears. Acta Otoralyngol 1967; 224: 393.

  7. Kaye BL. A simplified method for correcting the prominent ear. Plast Reconstr Surg 1967; 40: 44.

  8. Mustarde JC. The correction of prominent ears using simple mattress sutures. Br J Plast Surg 1963; 16: 170.

  9. Tramier H. Personal approach to treatment of prominent ears. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 99: 562.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Cir Plast. 1999;9