Hernández-Jiménez C, Olmos-Zúñiga JR, García-Torrentera R, Jasso-Victoria R, Solís-Bravo T, Reyes-Reyes M, Hernández-Quintana AA, Baltazares-Lipp M, Sánchez-Arrozena LS

Language: Spanish
References: 17
Page: 247-251
PDF size: 87.26 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Natural warming and humidification of the inspired air tend to be decreased in mechanical ventilation (MV) patients. The goal of this work was to evaluate the effect of humidity on lung mechanics (compliance, functional residual capacity (FRC), and airway resistance (RAW) in a canine experimental model with long-term mechanical ventilation.
Materials and methods: Ten dogs were subjected to 24-hours mechanical ventilation as follows: Group I (n = 5): mechanical ventilation with dry air. Group II (n = 5): mechanical ventilation with air from a humidifier chamber.
Results: Lung compliance was found to decrease in a higher rate for Group I than for Group II (ANOVA p = NS), while FRC decreased in both groups (ANOVA p = NS), with a lower rate for Group I. RAW values increased in both groups, with a lower rate for Group II (ANOVA p = NS).
Conclusions: There were no significant differences in ventilatory mechanics with dry air compared to air from a humidifier chamber.

REFERENCES

1. Fonkalsrud EW, Sánchez M, Higashijima I, Arima E. A comparative study of the effects of dry vs. humidified ventilation on canine lungs. Surgery 1975;78:373-380.

2. Goldsmith A, Shannon A. Humidification devices. Anaesthesia & Intensive Care Med 2009;10:465-467.

3. Branson RD, Chatburn RL. Humidification of inspired gases during mechanical ventilation. Respir Care 1993;38:461-468.

4. Gorayb SB, Braz JR, Martins RH, Módolo NS, Nakamura G. Inhaled gases humidification and heating during artificial ventilation with low flow and minimal fresh gases flow. Rev Bras Anestesiol 2004;54:20-36.

5. Mercke U. The influence of varying air humidity on mucociliary activity. Acta Otolaryngol 1975:79:133-139.

6. Dorsch JA, Dorsch SE. Anesthesia ventilators. In: Dorsch JA, Dorsch SE, editors. Understanding anesthesia equipment. The Circle System. 4th ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1999:309-353.

7. Woodson GE, Robbins KT. Nasal obstruction and pulmonary function: the role of humidification. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1985;93:505-511.

8. Estados Unidos Mexicanos. AFÍA. Especificaciones Técnicas para la producción, cuidado y uso de animales de laboratorio de la Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-062-ZOO-1999. Diario Oficial de la Federación, 6 diciembre 1999.

9. National Institutes of Healt USA. Guía para el cuidado y uso de los animales de laboratorio. Departament of Healt and Human Services, Public Healt Service, National Institutes of Healt USA. Edición Mexicana Auspiciada por la Academia Nacional de Medicina. México, D.F. 2002.

10. Olegard C, Söndergaard S, Houltz E, Lundin S, Stenqvist O. Estimation of functional residual capacity at the bedside using standard monitoring equipment: a modified nitrogen washout/washin technique requiring a small change of the inspired oxygen fraction. Anesth Analg 2005;101:206-212.

11. Marfatia S, Donahoe PK, Hendren WH. Effect of dry and humidified gases on the respiratory epithelium in rabbits. J Pediatr Surg 1975;10:583-592.

12. Rashad K, Wilson K, Hurt HH Jr, et ál. Effect of humidification of anesthetic gases on static compliance. Anesth Analg 1967;46:127-133.

13. Sottiaux TM. Consequences of under and over-humidification. Respir Care Clin N Am 2006;12:233-252.

14. Froese AB, Bryan AC. Effects of anesthesia and paralysis on diaphragmatic mechanics in man. Anesthesiology 1974;41:242-255.

15. Cohen lL, Weinberg PF, Fein IA, Rowinski GS. Endotracheal tube occlusion associated with the use of heat and moisture exchangers in the Intensive Care Unit. Crit Care Med 1988;16:277-279.

16. Tabka Z, Ben JA, Vergeret J, Guenard H. Effect of dry warm air on respiratory water loss in children with exercise-induced asthma. Chest 1988;94:81-86.

17. Modell JH, Giammona ST, Davis JH. Effect of chronic exposure to ultrasonic aerosols in the lung. Anesthesiology 1967;28:680-688.