medigraphic.com
ISSN 2007-3178 (Print)
Asociación Mexicana de Cirugía Bucal y Maxilofacial, Colegio Mexicano de Cirugía Bucal y Maxilofacial, A.C.

2012, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Cir Bucal Maxilofac 2012; 8 (1)

Computer-assisted craneofacial reconstruction at the Medical Center ISSEMYM Toluca, State of Mexico

González MF, Ramírez GJO, Ortega EJ

Language: Spanish
References: 13
Page: 4-9
PDF size: 191.13 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The craniofacial reconstruction is a surgical method that has advanced on the last few years. New materials like titanium and HTR (Hard tissue replacement) can be used on treatment of osseus sequelae of trauma, gunshot or tumoral resections. Besides the nature of this tailor made prosthetics makes the aesthetic and functional results to be substantially better than with other technologies; also the procedure is faster because there isn’t need to adapt the prosthesis or osteotomies. However the main disadvantage is the high cost, and the lack of manufacturing facilities in Mexico which involves the use of overseas laboratories for fabrication. This article presents a case of craniofacial reconstruction with tailor made HTR.


REFERENCES

  1. Sanan A, Haines S. Repairing holes in the head: A history of craneoplasty, Neurosurgery 1997; 40: 588-603.

  2. Zubillaga RI, Sánchez A. Montalvo G. Reconstrucción craneal con biomateriales. Revisión bibliográfica y estado actual. Rev Española Cirugía Oral y Maxilofacial 2007; 29: 79-89.

  3. Booth JA, Curtis BF. Report of a case of tumor of left frontal lobe of the the cerebrum: Operation-Recovery. Ann Surg 1893; 17: 128-139.

  4. Gerster AG. Heteroplasty for defect of skull. Trans Am Surg Assac 1895; 13: 485-486.

  5. Mauclaire P. Prosthese d’ivore pour reparer les pertes de substance du crane. Sac Chir Bull Mem 1914; 40: 113-115.

  6. Echeverría y Pérez E, Priego BRB et al. Diferentes aplicaciones de los implantes aloplásticos elaborados por metilmetacrilato y silicón. Rev Cir Plástica 2009; 19: 1-3, 51-56.

  7. Eslava CA, Neira AH. Reconstrucción frontoorbitonasal con implantes PSI. Reporte de un caso. Rev Fac Med 2009;17 (2): 286-292.

  8. Flores LG, Lovo IE. Reconstrucción craneofacial compleja: Malla de titanio, hueso autólogo preservado en óxido de etileno y reconstrucción tridimensional en polimetacrilato (HTR-PMI). Cir Plast Iberolatinoamericana 2010; 36 (1): 31.

  9. Ashman A et al. The introduction and history of HTR polimer, Department of Biomaterial, College of Dentistry, New York University, New York. New York, 1987.

  10. Biderman I et al. Grafts of HTR polymer versus Keil bone in experimental long bone defects in rats. In: Lemons J (Ed). Special Technical Publication No. 953, Philadelphia. American Society for Testing and Materials, 1987.

  11. Marin RM, San Hipolito ML, Belarra et al. Injertos sustitutos no óseos aportaciones del ácido poliláctico y poliglicolicol. Rev Av Periodon Implantol 2009; 21 (1): 45-52.

  12. Eppley BL, Sadove MA et al. Evaluation of HTR plymerasa craniofacial graft material. Plast Reconst Surg 1990; 86 (6): 1085-1092.

  13. Miranda VE, Rivera ET et al. Reconstrucción mandibular con prótesis hemimandibular de titanio y HTR con reemplazo total de ATM de polietileno de diseño individualizado por secuelas de resección tumoral. AMCBM Colegio, A.C. 2010; 6 (3): 100-105.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com