medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Cirugía y Cirujanos

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2000, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Cir Cir 2000; 68 (1)

Transcranial magnetic stimulation and acoustic trauma

Collado-Corona MA, I Mora-Magaña, Cordero-Guzmán LM, Toral-Martiñón R, Shkurovich-Zaslavsky M
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 11
Page: 10-13
PDF size: 88.49 Kb.


Key words:

, Transcranial magnetic stimulation, Acoustic trauma, Deafness, Safety.

ABSTRACT

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TCMS) is a non-invasive method for assessing motor function in humans. However, there are some reports that suggest internal ear cochlear damage. Fifteen patients with normal auditory function (ages 11 months to 16 years, mean 6.8 years) were tested with brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BSAEP), otoacoustic emissions (OAEs), acoustic reflex (AR), and conventional audiometric tests when possible, before and after (TCMS) transcranial magnetic stimulation for central motor conduction studies in different neurological pathologies. Patients had no auditory protection and no history of seizures. Motor evoked potentials as well as silent periods were recorded from the right abductor pollicis brevis and first dorsal interosseus muscles during rest and weak voluntary contraction when possible. A mean of 18 TCMS between 50 and 75% (1~1.5 Teslas intensity) were given to each patient; BSAEP, OAEs, AR, and audiometric tests were performed before and after TCMS and 2 weeks and 2 months after TCMS. Natural logarithmic transformation of amplitude data resulted in normal distribution. There were no significant differences in auditory function testing. Therefore, TCMS is a safe procedure for auditory function.


REFERENCES

  1. Chokroverty S, Hening W. Magnetic brain stimulation: safety studies. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995; 97: 36-42.

  2. Kandler RL. Safety of transcranial magnetic stimulation. The Lancet 1990; 335: 469.

  3. Wang H, Wang X, Scheich H. LTD and LTP induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation in auditory cortex. Neuroreport 1996; 7: 521-525.

  4. Margolis RH. Detection of hearing impairment with acoustic stapedius reflex and Oes. Ear Hear 1993; 14: 3-10.

  5. Mora-Magaña I, Collado-Corona MA, Toral-Martiñón R, Cano A. Acoustic trauma caused by lightning. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1996; 35: 59-68.

  6. Zenner HP. Possible roles of outer hair cells d.c. movements in the cochlea. Br J Audiol 1993; 27: 73-7.

  7. Macdonell RAL, Shapiro BE, Chiappa KH, Helmers SL, Cross D, Day BJ, Shahani BT, Phil D. Hemispheric threshold diffrences for motor evoked potentials produced by magnetic coil stimulation. Neurology 1991; 41: 1441-4.

  8. Jalinous R. Technical and practical aspects of magnetic stimulation. J Clin Neurophysiol 1991; 8: 10-25.

  9. Counter SA, Borg E, Lofquist L, Brisma T. Hearing loss from acoustic artifact of the coil used in extracranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology 1990; 40: 1159-62.

  10. Hiroshi Y, Tetsuya T, Ken IW, Akichica M, Ensor E. Transfeldt. Effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation on cerebral function in a monkey model. Electroenceph, Clin Neurophysiol 1995; 97: 140-44.

  11. Barker AT, Stevens JC. Measurement of the acoustic output from two magnetic nerve stimulator coils. J Physiol 1991; 431: 301.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Cir Cir. 2000;68