medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Urología

Organo Oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Urología
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2012, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Urol 2012; 72 (2)

Abscess of the corpora cavernosa

Campos-Salcedo JG, Terrazas-Rios JL, Sedano-Lozano A, Castro-Marin M, Flores-Terrazas JE, López-Silvestre JC, Zapata-Villalba Miguel A, Mendoza-Alvarez Luis A, Estrada-Carrasco Carlos E, Paredes-Calva C, Rosas-Hernandez H
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 11
Page: 79-83
PDF size: 378.31 Kb.


Key words:

Abscess, penile, cavernous, Mexico.

ABSTRACT

Penile abscesses are a rare cause of infectious penile pathologies. Among the most important causes are immunosuppressed states, trauma, the administration of intracavernous medication, and adjacent site infection. The most commonly reported etiologic agent is Escherichia coli, although new bacterial and mycotic agents have recently arisen. Diagnosis requires complete evaluation with a high degree of suspicion.
The patient is a 58-year-old man with diabetes and ongoing high blood pressure who presented with onemonth progression of urinary storage symptoms and subjective fever. He was referred to the emergency room due to severe acute loss of metabolic control and urinary tract infection symptoms. A transurethral catheter was placed and removed after one week. The patient presented with a non-painful increase in penile diameter, augmented penile temperature, and important edema and temperature elevation in the corpora cavernosa that was painless upon palpation. The patient underwent transperineal open drainage of the corpora cavernosa, and the wound was washed and closed by secondary intention. The patient later underwent fifteen hyperbaric oxygen sessions at 2.6 atm.
Abscess of the corpora cavernosa is a rare clinical entity that mainly presents in patients with immunosuppression factors such as diabetes mellitus and with chronic infections. Diagnosis requires a high degree of suspicion, thorough physical examination, and diagnostic study support. The most useful is abdominopelvic computed axial tomography, which enables both diagnosis and opportune treatment.


REFERENCES

  1. Frank I, Lieber M. Gas containing cavernous abscess secondary to an intra-abdominal abscess. J Urol 1999;162:1382-1383.

  2. Pearle MS, Wendel EF. Necrotizing cavernositis secondary to periodontal abscess. J Urol 1993;149:1137-1138.

  3. Yoon H, Kim DS, Lim JS, et al. Intracavernosal injection of sildenafil citrate: Misapplication of the drug. J Urol 2001;165:1218- 1219.

  4. Sagar J, Sagar B, Shah DK. Spontaneous Penile (Cavernosal) Abscess: Case Report with Discussion of Aetiology, Diagnosis, and Management with Review of Literature. Scientific World Journal 2005;5:39-41.

  5. Pascual Regueiro D, García de Jalon Martínez A, Mallen Mateo E, et al. Penile curvature secondary to cavernous body abscess (2003). Actas Urol Esp 2003;27:55-59.

  6. Joudi FN, Kuehn DM, Williams RD. Maximizing clinical information obtained by CT. Urol Clin North Am 2006;33:287-300.

  7. Thanos L, Tsagouli P, Eukarpidis T, et al. Computed Tomography–Guided Drainage of a Corpus Cavernosum Abscess: A Minimally Invasíve Successful Treatment. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2011;34:217-219.

  8. Kropman RF, de la Fuente RB, Venema PL, et al. Treatment of corpus cavernosum abscess by aspiration and intravenous antibiotics. J Urol 1993;150:1502-1503.

  9. Sater AA, Vandendris M. Abscess of Corpus Cavernosum. J Urol 1989;141:949.

  10. Koskal T, Kadioglou A, Tefekli A, et al. Spontaneous bacterial abscess of bilateral cavernosal bodies. BJU Int 1999;84:1107-1108.

  11. Kameda K, Hayashi N, Arima K, et al. Abscess of corpus cavernosum: a case report: Hinyokika Kiyo 1998;44:893-895.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Urol. 2012;72