medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Cirujano General

ISSN 2594-1518 (Electronic)
ISSN 1405-0099 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2012, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Cir Gen 2012; 34 (1)

Bogota bag, resistant in open abdomen

Mejía RG, Mejía PSI
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page: 54-57
PDF size: 63.13 Kb.


Key words:

Modified Bogota bag, Bogota bag, open abdomen, abdominal sepsis, abdominal wall defects.

ABSTRACT

Objective: To present a modification to the placement of the Bogota bag, which, aside from retaining the useful characteristics of this technique, adds more strength to the support or resistance of the polyvinyl layer in patients with open abdomen.
Setting: Second level health care hospital. Hospital General de Zona 53, Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS, for its initials in Spanish).
Design: Pilot study.
Statistical analysis: Percentage as summary measure for qualitative variables.
Patients and methods: From December 2008 to March 2009 we treated six patients with this modified technique of the Bogota bag. Age of patients ranged from 40 to 78 years; three were men. Five patients coursed with abdominal sepsis and the other lost the abdominal wall. We included those patients with indications of open abdomen and, consequently, a possibility of reoperation. With our technique, we searched for early mobilization and deambulation of patients, as safe support of abdominal content, without using compressive abdominal bandaging, which is needed to avoid evisceration, as usually happens with the placement of the traditional Bogota bag, aside from preventing evisceration in a case with ventilatory support.
Results: In five patients, there were antecedents of 1 or 2 previous surgeries. Only in one patient was this modification applied in the first surgery. There was one death not related with the procedure but due to hepatic failure. This case had ventilatory support, and was supported by the modified Bogota bag without evisceration. In the five remaining patients the modification allowed for early mobilization and deambulation without requiring abdominal bandaging. No patients was reoperated, and wall closure was performed as for planned ventral hernia. All patients tolerated early mobilization and/or use of ventilatory support without evisceration.
Conclusions: This modification improves de performance of the Bogota bag, standing out the greater resistance and, in consequence, early mobilization and deambulation without the risk of evisceration.


REFERENCES

  1. Teichmann W, Wittmann DH, Andreone PA. Scheduled reoperations (etappenlavage) for diffuse peritonitis. Arch Surg 1986; 121: 147-152.

  2. Hedderich GS, Wexler MJ, McLean AP, Meakins JL. The septic abdomen: open management with Marlex mesh with a zipper. Surgery 1986; 99: 399-408.

  3. Vertrees A, Kellicut D, Ottman S, Peoples G, Shriver C. Early definitive abdominal closure using serial closure technique on injured soldiers returning from Afghanistan and Iraq. J Am Coll Surg 2006; 202: 762-772.

  4. Vertrees A, Greer L, Pickett C, Nelson J, Wakefield M, Stojadinovic A, et al. Modern management of complex open abdominal wounds of war: a 5-year experience. J Am Coll Surg 2008; 207: 801-809.

  5. Fabian TF. Damage control in trauma: laparotomy wound management acute to chronic. Surg Clin North Am 2007; 87: 73-93.

  6. Borráez O. Abdomen abierto: la herida más desafiante. Rev Colomb Cir 2008; 23: 204-209.

  7. Tavares de la Paz LA, Andrade de la Garza P, Gone-Fernández A, Sánchez-Fernández P. Abdomen abierto. Evolución en su manejo. Cir Cir 2008; 76: 177-186.

  8. Joglar F, Agosto E, Marrero D, Canario QM, Rodríguez P. Dynamic retention suture closure: modified Bogota bag approach. J Surg Res 2010; 162: 274-278.

  9. Martínez OJL, Cruz OPA, Chacon ME, De la Fuente LM, Chavelas LM, Blanco BR. Manejo de la pared abdominal en sepsis. Comparación entre dos técnicas. Rev Gastroenterol Mex 2004; 69: 88-93.

  10. Paran H, Mayo A, Afanasiev A, Epstein T, Neufeld D, Kluger Y, et al. Staged primary closure of the abdominal wall in patients with abdominal compartment syndrome. J Trauma 2001; 51: 1204-1206.

  11. Bee TK, Croce MA, Magnotti LJ, Zarzaur BL, Maish GO, Minard G, et al. Temporary abdominal closure techniques: a prospective randomized trial comparing polyglactin 910 mesh and vacuum-assisted closure. J Trauma 2008; 65: 337-344.

  12. Weinberg JA, George RL, Griffin RL, Stewart AH, Reiff DA, Kerby JD, et al. Closing the open abdomen: improved success with Wittmann Patch staged abdominal closure. J Trauma 2008; 65: 345-348.

  13. Liu L, Li JS, Li N, Ren JA, Zhao YZ. Reconstruction of infected complex abdominal wall defects with autogenous pedicled demucosalized small intestinal sheet. Surgery 2009; 145: 114-119.

  14. Howdieshell TR, Proctor CD, Sternberg E, Cué JI, Mondy JS, Hawkins ML. Temporary abdominal closure followed by definitive abdominal wall reconstruction of the open abdomen. Am J Surg 2004; 188: 301-306.

  15. Fabian TC, Croce MA, Pritchard FE, Minard G, Hickerson WL, Howell RL, et al. Planned ventral hernia. Staged management for acute abdominal wall defects. Ann Surg 1994; 219: 643-653.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Cir Gen. 2012;34