medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Cubana de Oftalmología

ISSN 1561-3070 (Electronic)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2012, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cub Oftal 2012; 25 (1)

Postsurgical astigmatism in phacoemulsification according to the surgical site

Hernández SJR, Ramos LM, Curbelo CL, Fernández VG, Rio TM, Ruiz RY
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page:
PDF size: 278.54 Kb.


Key words:

Induced astigmatism, temporal incisions, phacoemulsification.

ABSTRACT

Objective: To determine the astigmatism induced by the phacoemulsification technique, according to the surgical site in the patients operated on from cataract in "Ramón Pando Ferrer" Cuban Institute of Ophthalmology in the period of January to December 2010.
Methods: A retrospective, longitudinal and descriptive study was conducted to evaluate the behaviour of post surgery astigmatism in 2510 patients operated on from cataract by means of phacoemulsification technique (Phaco Chop) for different approach areas of main incision (upper, oblique, temporal) and extracapsulary cataract extraction with tunnelized incisions. Variables such as best corrected and non-corrected visual acuity, hardness of the crystalline lens, site of incision, spheral equivalent, keratometry, and induced astigmatism were all analyzed.
Results: The mean induced astigmatism in phacoemulsification was 0.45 D, and for the extracapsulary cataract extraction technique was 1.30 D. When relating to the crystalline hardness, the induced astigmatism was 0, 44 D in the nuclei of 2 hardness crossings. The induced astigmatism was 0.03 D with temporal incisions or smaller than or similar to 3mm. The best non-corrected average visual acuity before surgery was 0.12 and after surgery was 0.31, whereas the preoperative corrected acuity was 0.50 and the postoperative value was 0.77. These values were better in temporal incisions with four lines of visual gain without correction and five lines with correction. The best spheral equivalent was 0.73 D in the temporal incision.
Conclusion: The phacoemulsification on the temporary side induces smaller postoperative astigmatism with better satisfactory visual gain for the patient.


REFERENCES

  1. Vargas Grimont AB. Optometría y Óptica I y II. La Habana: Editorial Ciencias Médicas; 2005.

  2. Hernández Silva JR, Curbelo Cunill L, Fernández Vázquez G, Ramos López M, Rio Torres M, Rios Caso R, Barroso Lorenzo R. Evolución y técnicas de la microfacoemulsificación en Cuba. En: Río Torres M, Capote Cabrera C, Hernández Silva JR, Eguía Martínez F, Padilla González CM. Oftalmología Criterios y Tendencias Actuales. La Habana: Editorial Ciencias Médicas; 2009. p. 259.

  3. Osher RH. Combining phacoemulsification with corneal relaxing incisions for reduction of preexisting astigmatism. Paper presented at: The Annual Meeting of the American Intraocular Implant Society. Los Angeles: CA; 1984.

  4. Hernández Silva JR, Toxqui Abascal V, Río Torres M, Ramos López M, Curbelo Cunill L, Fernández Vásquez G, Rodríguez Suárez B. Facoemulsificación y queratotomía astigmática. Rev Cubana Oftalmol. 2007 [citado 31 de agosto de 2011];20(2). Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864 -21762007000200008&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=es

  5. Grunstein LL, Miller KM. Astigmatism management at the time of cataract surgery. Expert Rev Ophthalmol. 2011;6(3):297-305.

  6. Hernández Silva JR, Trujillo Blanco M, Río Torres M, Ramos López M, Curbelo Cunill L, Trujillo Blanco WG. LASIK-LASEK en defectos refractivos pos cirugías de catarata. Revista Cubana Oftalmol. 2008 [citado 31 de agosto de 2011];21(2). Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864 -21762008000200002&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=es

  7. Vitale S, Ellwein L, Cotch MF, Ferris FL, Sperrduto R. Prevalence of refractive error in the United States, 19992004. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(8):11119.

  8. Hoffer KJ. Biometry of 7500 cataractous eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 1980;90(3):360-8.

  9. Ninn-Pedersen K, Stenevi U, Ehinger B. Cataract patients in a defined Swedish population 1986-1990. II. Preoperative observations. Acta Ophthalmol. 1994;72(1):19.

  10. Hoffmann PC, Hütz WW. Analysis of biometry and prevalence data for corneal astigmatism in 23239 eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36(9):147985.

  11. Cristóbal José A, Ascaso Francisco J. Historia de la cirugía de la catarata. En: Centurión V, Nicoli C, Villar Kourí J, editores. El libro del cristalino de las Américas. Brasil: Livraria Edition; 2007. p. 25-35.

  12. Nichamin LD. Astigmatism control. Opthalmol Clin North Am. 2006;19(4):48593.

  13. Bechara R, Lorduy ML. Experiencias en facoemulsificación más implante de lente plegable y anestesia tópica. Franja Visual. 2002;7(26):13-15

  14. Alio JL, Rodríguez Prats JL, Galal A. MICS: Micro incision Cataract Surgery. Panamá: Highlights of Ophthalmology International; 2004.

  15. Shimizu K, Misawa A, Suzuki Y. Toric intraocular lenses: correcting astigmatism while controlling axis shift. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1994;20(5):5236.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Cub Oftal. 2012;25