medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Cubana de Investigaciones Biomédicas

ISSN 1561-3011 (Electronic)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2012, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cubana Invest Bioméd 2012; 31 (2)

Incomplete coronary revascularization and cardiac events following percutaneous coronary intervention

Flores SA, Llerena RRL, Cabalé VMB
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 13
Page: 199-206
PDF size: 173.21 Kb.


Key words:

incomplete coronary revascularization, cardiac events, percutaneous coronary intervention.

ABSTRACT

No conclusive data are available to evaluate the advantages of complete coronary revascularization in percutaneous coronary intervention. General objective: Determine whether incomplete revascularization is associated with the incidence of cardiac events following percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted with 192 patients with multivessel coronary disease and no history of coronary revascularization, treated by percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation at the Institute of Cardiology from 1 January 2003 to 31 December 2005. Statistical analysis: Relative risk was estimated to determine the association of incomplete revascularization with cardiac events. Results: On analyzing the association of incomplete revascularization with clinical events and cardiac procedures following percutaneous coronary intervention, no relation was obtained. Conclusions: Incomplete coronary revascularization is not associated with a higher incidence of cardiac events following percutaneous coronary intervention with conventional stent implantation.


REFERENCES

  1. Kim YH, Park DW, Lee JY, Kim WJ, Yun SC<, Ahn JM, et al. Impact of angiographic complete revascularization after drug-eluting stent implantation or coronary artery bypass graft surgery for multivessel coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2011;123(21):2373-81. >, Ahn JM, et al. Impact of angiographic complete revascularization after drug-eluting stent implantation or coronary artery bypass graft surgery for multivessel coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2011;123(21):2373-81.

  2. Tamburino C, Angiolillo DJ, Capranzano P, Dimopoulos K, La Manna A, Barbagallo R, et al. Complete versus incomplete revascularization in patients with multivessel disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008;72(4):448-56.

  3. Wijns W, Kolh P, Danchin N, Di Mario C, Falk V, Folliguet T, et al. Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Europ Heart J. 2010;31:2501-55.

  4. Hannan EL, Samadashvili Z, Walford G, Holmes DR Jr, Jacobs AK Stamato NJ, et al.Culprit vessel percutaneous coronary intervention versus multivessel and staged percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;3(1):22-31.

  5. Sarno G, Garg S, Onuma Y, Gutiérrez-Chico JL, van den Brand MJ, Rensing BJ, et al. Impact of completeness of revascularization on the five-year outcome in percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft patients (from the ARTS-II study). Am J Cardiol. 20;106(10):1369-75.

  6. Teplitsky I, Assali A, Lev E, Brosh D, Vaknin-Assa H, Kornowski R. Results of percutaneous coronary interventions in patients > or= 90 years of age. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007;70:937-43.

  7. Duvernoy CS, Smith DE, Manohar P, Schaefer A, Kline-Rogers E, Share, et al. Gender differences in adverse outcomes after Contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention: Ananalysis from the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium (BMC2) percutaneous Coronary intervention registry. Am Heart J. 2010;159:1359-62.

  8. Bevc S, Penko M, Kanic V, Hojs R. Mortality of patients with renal dysfunction after percutaneous coronary intervention. Angiology. 2010;61:24-30.

  9. Navarese EP, De Servi S, Buffon A, Suryapranata H, De Luca G. Clinical impact of simultaneous complete revascularization vs. culprit only primary angioplasty in patients with st-elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease: a meta-analysis. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2011;31(2):217-25.

  10. Yang HH, Chen Y, Gao CY. The influence of complete coronary revascularization on long-term outcomes in patients with multivessel coronary heart disease undergoing successful percutaneous coronary intervention. J Int Med Res. 2010;38(3):1106-12.

  11. Keelan ET, Nunez BD, Grill DE. Comparison of inmediate and long-term outcome of coronary angioplasty performed for unstable angina and rest pain in men and women. Mayo Clin Proc. 1997;72:5-12.

  12. Heidland UE, Michel CJ, Aktug O, Heintzen MP, Strauer BE. Determinants of long term follow-up after stents implantation in acute myocardial infarction. Z Kardiol. 2002;91:905-12.

  13. Jeger RV, Pfisterer ME. Primary PCI in STEMI-dilemmas and controversies: multivessel disease in STEMI patients. Complete versus Culprit Vessel revascularization in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Minerva Cardioangiol. 2011;59(3):225-33.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Cubana Invest Bioméd. 2012;31