Santillán-Doherty P, Martín-del-Campo LA, Herrera-Zamora J, Betancourt-Ferreyra J, Lisker R

Language: Spanish
References: 9
Page: 114-115
PDF size: 30.90 Kb.

Text Extraction

No abstract

REFERENCES

1. Santillán-Doherty P, Cabral-Castañeda A, Soto-Ramirez L. [Informed consent in clinical practice and medical research]. Rev Invest Clin 2003; 55: 322-38.

2. Garrard E, Dawson A. What is the role of the research ethics committee? Paternalism, inducements, and harm in research ethics. J Med Ethics 2005; 31: 419-23.

3. Schwenzer KJ. Practical tips for working effectively with your institutional review board. Respir Care 2008; 53: 1354-61.

4. Coleman CH, Lemmens T, Mehra T, Toure A. Research ethics committees. Research ethics committees: basic concepts for capacity-building. In Organization WH, ed. Geneve, 2009.

5. Enfield KB, Truwit JD. The purpose, composition, and function of an institutional review board: balancing priorities. Respir Care 2008; 53: 1330-6.

6. Angell E, Dixon-Woods M. Do research ethics committees identify process errors in applications for ethical approval? J Med Ethics 2009; 35: 130-2.

7. Angell EL, Jackson CJ, Ashcroft RE, et al. Is ‘inconsistency’ in research ethics committee decision-making really a problem? An empirical investigation and reflection. Clin Ethics 2007; 2: 92-99.

8. Shaul R. Reviewing the reviewers: the vague accountability of research ethics committees. Crit Care 2002; 6: 121-2.

9. Coleman CH, Bouesseau MC. How do we know that research ethics committees are really working? The neglected role of outcomes assessment in research ethics review. BMC Med Ethics 2008; 9: 6.