Hernández-Ferreras K, Sánchez-Aldereguía S, Fundora-Mirabal J, Cardenas-de-Baños L, Bencomo-Díaz D, Dorta-Contreras AJ

Language: Spanish
References: 13
Page: 305-307
PDF size: 18.12 Kb.

Text Extraction

No abstract.

REFERENCES

1. Garfield E, Sher IH. New factors in the evaluation of scientific literature through citation indexing. American Documentation. 1963;14(3):195-201.

2. Martyn J, Gilchrist A. An evaluation of British scientific journals (Aslib Occasional Publication, no. 1). London: Aslib, 1968.

3. Garfield E. Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science. 1972; 178(4060):4719.

4. Archambault É, Larivière V. History of journal impact factor: contingencies and consequences, Scientometrics. 2009;79(3):639-53.

5. Seglen PO. Why the impact factor of journals should not be use for evaluating research. British Medical Journal. 1977;314:497-507.

6. Moed HF, Van Leeuwen TN. Improving the accuracy of Institute for Scientific Informations journal impact factors. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 1995;46(6):461-7.

7. Glänzel W, Moed HF. Journal impact measures in bibliometric research. Scientometrics. 2002;53(2):171-93.

8. Aréchaga JM. Las revistas profesionales como claves para el desarrollo de la ciencia, la medicina y la tecnología en España. Panace@. 2005;4(19).

9. Rossner M, Van Epps H, Hill E. Show me the data. J Cell Biol. 2007;179(6): 10911092.

10. Smith R. Journal accused of manipulating impact factor. British Medical Journal. 1997;314(7079):463.

11. Metze K. Bureaucrats, researchers, editors, and the impact factor - a vicious circle that is detrimental to science. Clinics. 2010;65(10):937-40.

12. Hernán MA. Epidemiologists (of all people) should question journal impact factors. Epidemiology. 2008;19:3668.

13. PLoS Medicine Editors. The impact factor game: It is time to find a better way to assess the scientific literature. PLoS Medicine; 2006:3:291.