medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Electrónica de Psicología Iztacala

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2012, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Elec Psic Izt 2012; 15 (1)

Abaut the conception of the tiberghiana “science of the soul” as a critic to the positivist idea of psychology in the second half of the Mexican nineteenth century

Olivier TC
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 7
Page: 230-245
PDF size: 163.38 Kb.


Key words:

Spiritualistic psychologoy, positivist psychologoy, spirit, soul.

ABSTRACT

After the incorporation of the book from Guillaume Tiberghien in the Escuela Nacional Preparatoria, there was a discussion between Plotino Rhodakanaty and Aniceto Villamar about the idea of psychology. The reference point to Plotino Rhodakanaty was Guillaume Tiberghien and Augusto Comte for Aniceto Villamar. This investigation respond two questions: What is the importance of psychology in the philosophical system created by Krause and drove it by Tiberghien? and What are their idea of psychology? Very important questions because Tiberghien ideas were critical to the fundamental suppositions of the positivist psychology. The final thoughts are that despite the fascism lived, the psychology History, perhaps science of the soul, still has a long way to go.


REFERENCES

  1. Boring, E. G. (2006). Historia de la psicología experimental, México: Trillas.

  2. Leclére, L. M. (S/A). Guillermo Tiberghien. En G. Tiberghien, Tesis, Valencia: Sempere y Compañía.

  3. Meneses E. (2001). Tendencias educativas en México, 1821-1911, México: Centro de Estudios Educativos-Universidad Iberoamericana.

  4. Oliver, C. (1880). Del Escalpelo a la Razón. Crítica de Plotino Rhodakanaty al concepto positivista de psicología. En C. Mondragón (2011), Saberes de la psicología. Entre la teoría y la práctica, México: Facultad de Estudios Superiores Iztacala-Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

  5. Sánchez, S. (2003). Krausismo en México, México, UNAM.

  6. Tiberghien G. (1868). La sciencie de l’ame. Bruxelles: Fr. Gobbaerts, Imprimeur du Roi.

  7. Tiberghien, G. (1875). Introducción a la filosofía y preparación a la metafísica. Madrid: Imprenta de la Revista de la Legislación.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Elec Psic Izt. 2012;15