medigraphic.com
ISSN 0001-0944 (Print)
Órgano Oficial de la Asociación Dental Mexicana

2012, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Rev ADM 2012; 69 (4)

Biomimetization of osseointegrated implants using the combined techniques of extraction, placement, and passive immediate loading

Lugo JC, Guzmán FA

Language: Spanish
References: 21
Page: 186-190
PDF size: 168.30 Kb.


ABSTRACT

When one or more teeth need to be replaced, expectations regarding the outcome of such a procedure may vary depending on the initial clinical situation, these ranging from near-perfect restorations in which the implant is virtually undetectable to anything other than a trained eye, to the acceptance of varying degrees of aesthetic issues.
Today, it is possible to combine a range of surgical and prosthetic techniques to prevent the collapse of tissues following an extraction and allow the possibility of placing one or more implant-supported prostheses during a single surgical event.
This article describes the biological bases for extraction, placement, and immediate-loading procedures, as predictable though non-routine procedures with which to achieve a high level of aesthetics.


REFERENCES

  1. Lazar R. J. Immediate implant placement into extraction sites: surgical and restorative advantages. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1989; 9(5): 332-43.

  2. Missika P, Abbou M, Rahal B. Osseous regeneration of bone assessment. Int J Periodont Aesthet Dent 1997; 9(2): 165-76.

  3. Schwartz-Arad D, Chaushu G. Placement of implants into fresh extractions sites: 4 to 7 years retrospective evaluation of 95 immediate implants.J Periodontol, 1997; 68(11): 1110-6.

  4. Wilson TG Jr, Schen R, Buser D, et al. Implants placed in immediate extraction sites: a report of histologic and histometric analyses of human biopsies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998; 13(3): 333-41.

  5. Becker W, Dahlin C, Becker BE, et al. The use of e-PTFE barrier membranes for bone promotion around titanium implants placed in to extraction sockets: a prospective multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Implants 1994; 91(1): 31-40.

  6. Gelb DA. Immediate implant surgery: Three-year retrospective evaluation of 50 consecutive cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993; 8(4): 338-99.

  7. Simion M, Dahlin C, Trisi P, et al. Qualitative and quantitative comparative study on different filling materials used in bone tissue regeneration: a controlled clinical study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1994; 14(3): 198-215.

  8. Ledermann PD. Stegprothetische versogung des zahnlosen unterkiefers mit hilfe von plasmabeschichteten titanshaubenimplanten. Dtsch Zahnarthl Z 1979; 34: 907-911.

  9. Branemark PI, Zarb G, Albretsson T. Tissue-integrated prostheses: oseoitegration in clinical dentistry. Quintessence 1985. .pp 11-76.

  10. Branemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, Breine U, Lindstom J, Hallen O, et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10 year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl 1997; 16: 1-132.

  11. Laney WR, Tolman DE, Keller EE, Dental implants: tissueintegrated prosthesis utilizing the osseointegration concept. Mayo Clin Proc 1986; 61:91-97.

  12. Sagara M, Akawaga Y, Nikau H, Tsuru H. The effects of early occlusal loading on one-stage titanium alloy implants in beagle dogs: A pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 69:281-288.

  13. Zubery Y, Bichacho N, Moses O, Tal H. Immediate loading of modular transitional implants: a histologic and histomorphometric study in dogs. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1999; 19: 343-353.

  14. Piattelli A, Corigliano M, Scarano A, Costigliola G, Paolantonino M. Immediate loading of titanium-sprayed implants: an histologic análisis in monkeys. J Periodontol 1998; 69:321-327.

  15. Romanos GE, Toh CG, Siar CH, Swaminathan D. Histologic an histomorphometric evaluation of peri-implant bone subjected to immediate loading: an experimental study whit macaca fascicularis. Int J Maxillofac Implants 2002; 17: 44-51.

  16. Nkenke E, Fenner M, Vairactaris EG, Neukam FW, Troger MR. Immediate versus delayed loading of dental implants in the maxillae of minipigs. Histomorphometrics analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005; 20:540-546.

  17. Maniatopoulos C, Pilliar RM, Smith D. Threaded versus poroussurfaced designs for implant stabilization in bone-endodontic implant model. J Biomed Mater Res 1986; 20: 1309-1333.

  18. Szmukler-Monkler S, Salama H, Reingerwitz Y, Dubruille JH. Timing of loading and effect of micromotion on bone dental implant interface: Review of experimental literature. J Biomed Mater Res 1998; 43:192-203.

  19. Calandriello R, Tomatis M. Simplified treatment of atrophic posterior maxilla via immediate /early function and tilted implants: a prospective 1-year clinical study. Clin Implant Dent, (Supp 7):1-7, 2005.

  20. Degidi M, Piattelli A. Comparative analysis study of 702 dental implants subjected to immediate functional loading and immediate con functional loading to tradicional healing periods whit a follow up of up to 24 months. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005; 20: 99-107.

  21. Magne P, Belser UC. Bonded Porcelain Restorations in the Anterior Dentition. A biomimetic Approach. Chicago/Berlin: Quintessence Books. 2002.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com