medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Cirugía Endoscópica

ISSN 1665-2576 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2012, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Cir Endoscop 2012; 13 (2)

Experience on 796 cases of laparoscopic cholecystectomy using a risk score of conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery

Granados RJJ, Sevilla DM, Valderrama AI, Gutiérrez BCA, Valdés PJO
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page: 80-84
PDF size: 37.47 Kb.


Key words:

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, risk factors, conversion to open surgery, complications, staging.

ABSTRACT

Methods: 796 subjects have been studied and been into surgery from January 2001 to December 2009. The mean age is 53 years with sex predominance for females 84%. Elective surgery for 92.3% and urgent surgery in 7.7%. Average surgical time was 54 minutes. Results: By using the conversion to open surgery risk scale 45 subjects (5.7%) were classified as high risk and the conversion to open surgery was realized for 38 patients (4.8%). The most common causes for conversion to open surgery were bleeding from gallbladder bed (3%) and poor visualization of common bile ducts (0.9%). There were complications for 11 subjects, nine had retained choledocholithiasis and one had liver abscess due to common bile duct compression this subject were surgically treated twice. One subject had common bile duct injury not detected at the time of operation, solved later with biliary enteric anastomosis. Conclusion: This risk scale allows the surgeon to predict with reliability the risk that a patient has for conversion to open surgery that formerly was laparoscopic. With 89% sensibility and 98% specificity and a positive predictive value of 71% and negative predictive value of 99%. The conversion rate indicates that there is no complication free procedure.


REFERENCES

  1. Bermudes-Pestonit I et al. Colecistectomía laparoscópica en régimen ambulatorio. Cir Esp 2004; 76: 159-163.

  2. Martínez Viera A et al. Colecistectomía laparoscópica en el tratamiento de la litiasis biliar: ¿cirugía mayor ambulatoria o corta estancia? Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2004; 96: 452-459.

  3. Paredes JP et al. Mil colecistectomías laparoscópicas: indicaciones y resultados. Cir Esp 2001; 70: 195-199.

  4. Perrier JP. La insuflación rápida de CO2 no aumenta el dolor postoperatorio en la colecistectomía laparoscópica. Ensayo aleatorio. Cir Esp 2004; 75: 340-344.

  5. Pozo E, Giganto F, Rodrigo L. Colelitiasis no complicada asociada con ERGE. Resultados de la cirugía laparoscópica combinada en pacientes con bajo riesgo quirúrgico. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2004; 96: 237-245.

  6. Granados J, Nieva R, Olvera G, Londaiz R, Cabal K, Sánchez D, Martínez G, Guerrero F, Pérez C. Criterios de conversión de cirugía laparoscópica a cirugía abierta y complicaciones postcolecistectomía: una estadificación preoperatoria. Rev Mex Cir Endoscópica 2001; 2: 134-141.

  7. Granados RJ, Valderrama TA, Sevilla DM. Desarrollo de habilidades básicas en cirugía laparoscópica en estudiantes de segundo año de licenciatura de médico cirujano de la Facultad de Medicina UNAM. Rev Mex Cir Endoscópica 2011; 3: 129-135.

  8. Weber SA, Villazón DO, Mijares CG. Historia de la cirugía laparoscópica. En: Cueto García J, Webber Sánchez A. Cirugía laparoscópica. 2ª Edición. México, Ed. McGraw-Hill Interamericana; 2007: 3-8.

  9. Daniel W. Bioestadística. Base para el análisis de las ciencias de la salud. 4ª ed. Limusa-Wiley; 2007: 71-79.

  10. Graber NJ, Shultz LS. Laparoscopic abdominal surgery. 1º ed. McGraw-Hill Interamericana; 1993: 217-221.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Cir Endoscop. 2012;13