medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista de Especialidades Médico-Quirúrgicas

Instituto de Seguridad y Servicios Sociales de los Trabajadores del Estado
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2012, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Rev Esp Med Quir 2012; 17 (4)

Posterior spinal re-expansion with application of intracorporeal bone graft in thoraco-lumbar fractures (Rebatu's technique) without intervetebral fusion

González RyGA, Amaya HDC
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 17
Page: 273-278
PDF size: 178.04 Kb.


Key words:

Thoraco-lumbar fractures, spinal re-expansion, osteosynthesis.

ABSTRACT

Background: Thoraco-lumbar fractures of the spine are serious injuries that endanger patient's life and produce severe sequelae, with the highest incidence in young people. The objective of surgical treatment of vertebral fractures is to restore the stability of the spine and preserve neurological function for an early mobilization of the patient to maintain the maximum number of mobile segments. Transpedicular osteosynthesis of two or more functional segments with the inclusion of the fractured vertebra is a common and recommended practice in the treatment of vertebral fractures.
Objective: To compare the percentage of vertebral collapse postsurgery and the evolution of patients with unstable thoraco-lumbar fractures using the method of vertebral re-expand (Rebatu technique) and posterior instrumentation.
Patients and method: There were two groups of patients; in the first was performed posterior instrumentation with traditional technique in patients with thoraco-lumbar fractures; in the other group the same procedure was performed, in addition to re-expansion of vertebra with intracorporeus autologous graft, through fluoroscopic visualization. We got antero-posterior and lateral radiographs of thoracolumbar spine, measurements of thoracic kyphosis, and percentage of fractured vertebra compression of all patients. At the end of the procedure, and then at 2, 4, 6 and 12 months same measurements were made. Vertebral re-expansion technique was created by Alejandro Gonzalez Rebatu y Gonzalez, spinal surgeon and orthopedist at Regional Hospital 1° de Octubre, ISSSTE.
Results: Twelve patients treated only with posterior instrumentation suffered a vertebral collapse in 10 to 25% of the vertebral body, clinically manifested with pain in thoraco-lumbar region, normal curvature changes and, in some cases, radicular involvement. This collapse did not decrease at all despite rehabilitation, analgesic and relaxing muscle. One of the 12 patients treated with posterior instrumentation showed fatigue of osteosynthesis material nine months after the treatment, and other patient rejected osteosynthesis material, so it was necessary to remove it.



REFERENCES

  1. Campbell. Fracturas, luxaciones y fracturas luxaciones de la columna. Cirugía Ortopédica. 9a ed. Madrid: Harcourt- Brace, 1998;1597-1678.

  2. Denis F. The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries. Spine 1983;8:817-831.

  3. Panjabi MM, Hansfeld JN, White AA. A biomechanical study of ligamentous stability of the thoracic spine in man. Acta Orthop Scand 1981;52:315.

  4. Denis F. Spinal instability as defined by the three column spine concept in acute spinal trauma. Clin Orthop 1984;65:76.

  5. Goldstein JB, Cunningham BW. Instrumentación raquídea para fracturas torácicas y lumbares. Rothman-Simione, Columna vertebral 1999:1085-1086.

  6. Journal of the Southern Orthopaedic Association. Pedicle screw instrumentation for unstable thoracolumbar fracture. SOA Residents and Fellows Conference. Baltimore, 1996.

  7. Ghanayen AJ, Zdeblick TA. Anterior instrumentation in the management of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Cin Orthop Relat Res 1997;335:89-100.

  8. Crisastello AA, Frederickson BE. Spinal trauma thoracolumbar spine injuries. Orthopaedics 1997;939:944.

  9. Duffo OM. Nuevo sistema de clasificación de fracturas en columna vertebral del Dr. Paul R. Meyer Jr. Revista Mexicana de Ortopedia y Trauma 1998;12:549-553.

  10. Slosar PJ, Patwardham AG. Instability of the lumbar burst fracture and limitations of transpedicular instrumentation. Spine 1995;20:1452-1461.

  11. McLain RF, Sparling E. Early failure of short segment pedicle instrumentation for thoracolumbar fracture. J Bone Joint Surg 1993;162:167.

  12. Akbarnia BA. Transpediclar posterolateral decompression in spinal fractures and tumors. In: Bridwell KH, de Wald RL, editors. The textbook the spinal surgery. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincot-Raven, 1997;1925-1934.

  13. Ciappetta P, Delfini R, Costanzo G. Posterolateral decompression and stabilization of thotacolumbar injuries using diapason instrumentation. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1996;138:314-321.

  14. Dendrinos GK, Halikias JG, Krallis PN, Asimakopoulos A. Factors influencing neurological recovery in bursa thoracolumbar fractures. Acta Orthop Belg 1995;61:226-234.

  15. Fidler M. Remodeling of the spinal canal alter bursa fractures: a prospective study of two cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1988;70:730-732.

  16. Garfin SR, Mowery CA, Guerra J, Marshall LF Confirmation of the posterolatral tecnique to descompress and fuse thoracolumbar spine burst fracture. Spine 1985;10:218-223.

  17. McEvoy RD, Bradford DS. The management of burst fracture of the thoracic and lumbar spine: experience in 53 patients. Spine 1985;10:631-637.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Esp Med Quir. 2012;17