medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Cubana de Cardiología y Cirugía Cardiovascular

ISSN 1561-2937 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2013, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cubana Cardiol Cir Cardiovasc 2013; 19 (1)

Integral diagnosis of coronary atherosclerosis by coronary multidetector computed tomographyand by invasive coronary angiography

Llerena-Rojas LR, Llerena-Rojas LD, Mendoza-Rodríguez V, Olivares-Aquiles EW, Marcos-Gutierrez Y, Bencomo-Rodriguez L, Rodríguez-Nande LM
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 25
Page: 25-32
PDF size: 340.56 Kb.


Key words:

coronary angiography, computed tomography, coronary stenosis, calcium score.

ABSTRACT

Introduction Coronary angiography by multidetector computed tomography (CMDCT) visualizes the wall and lumen of coronary arteries. Invasivecoronary angiography (INVCA) only visualizes the arterial lumen but with better resolution.
Objective To assess the contribution of CMDCT and INVCA to the integral diagnosis of coronary atherosclerosis.
Method Eighty five patients suspicious of coronary atherosclerosis were consecutively studied in our centre between 2006 and 2011 by CMDCT and INVCA. Two groups of patients were formed accordingly with INVCA: Group I with stenotic plaques 50% or greater (S≥50%) including stenosis below 50% (S<50%) and Group II only with S<50%. Variables analyzed: age, sex and accordingly with CMDCT, total number of plaques, localization and classification in calcified, soft and mixed plaques.
Result In Group I were observed 48 patients with 512 plaques, 63 of them with S≥50%, only 5% calcified and 37 patients in Group II with 217 plaques. The 77% of all plaques with S< 50% in both groups were calcified. Only two of 35 patients with S≥50% in the left main coronary artery were detected by INVCA. In 6 patients the diagnosis was erroneous or doubtful by CMDCT on account of artifacts and INVCA was necessary to assure it.
Conclusions CMDCT and INVCA contribute to the integral diagnosis of coronary atherosclerosis. CMDCT allows earlier diagnosis of coronary plaques and assess its composition. INVCA with better resolution visualizes very thin vessels and contribute to the assessment of not well defined images by CMDCT.


REFERENCES

  1. Bruschke AVG, Sheldon WC, Shirey EK, Proudfit WL. A half century of selective coronaryarteriography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:2139-44.

  2. Patel MR, Dehmer GJ, Hirshfeld JW, Smith PK, Spertus JA.ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/SCCT 2012 appropriate use criteria for coronary revascularization focused update: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:857-81.

  3. Budoff MJ, Achenbach S, Blumenthal RS, Carr JJ, Goldin JG, Greenland P, et al. Assessment of coronaryartery disease by cardiac computed tomography. A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and Committee on Cardiac Imaging, Council on Clinical Cardiology. Circulation. 2006;114:1761-91.

  4. Taylor AJ, Cerqueira M, Hodgson JM, Mark D, Min J, O’Gara P, et al.ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR. 2010 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Computed Tomography. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 56:1864-94.

  5. Agatston AS, Jnowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, ViamonteMJr, Detrano R. Quantification of coronaryartery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;827-32.

  6. Glagov S, Weisenberg E, Zarins CK, Stankunavicius R, Kolettis GJ. Compensatory enlargement of humanatherosclerotic coronary arteries. N Engl J Med. 1987;316:1371- 75.

  7. Vanarva A. Coronary artery remodelling. Heart.1998;79:109–10.

  8. Little WC, Constantinescu M, Applegate RJ, Kutcher MA, Burrows MT, Kahl FR et al. Can coronaryangiography predict the site of a subsequent myocardial infarction in patients with mid-to-moderatecoronary artery disease ? Circulation. 1988;78:1157- 66.

  9. Arbab-Zadeh A, Nakano M, Virmani R, Fuster V. Acute coronary events. Circulation. 2012;125:1147-56.

  10. Aldrovandi A, Cademartiri F, Menozzi A, Ugo F, Lima D, Maffei E, et al. Evaluation of coronaryAtherosclerosis by multislice computed tomography in patients with acute myocardial infarction and without significant coronary artery stenosis. A comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008;1:205-211.

  11. Pflederer T, Marwan M, Schepis T, Ropers D, Seltmann M, Muschiol G, et al. Characterization of culprit Lesions in acute coronary syndromes using coronary dual-source CT angiography. Atherosclerosis.2010;211:437- 44.

  12. Motoyama S, Sarai M, Harigaya H, Anno H, Inoue K. Hara T, et al. Computed tomographic angiographycharacteristics of atherosclerotic plaques subsequently resulting in acute coronary syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:49- 57.

  13. Stone GW, Maehara A, Lansky A, de Bruyne B, Cristea E, Mintz GS, et al. A prospective natural-history Study of coronary atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:226- 35.

  14. Llerena-Rojas LR. Aspectos polémicos, limitaciones y perspectivas del estudio de las arterias coronarias por tomografía computarizada. Rev Cubana Cardiol Cir Cardiovasc. 2010;16:118-22.

  15. Van der Huyesen AG, Gijsen FJH, Wentzel JJ, Jairam PM, Van Walsum T, Neefjes LAE, et al. Small calcifications are not detectable by 64-slice contrast enhanced computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;27:143-52.

  16. Villines TC, Hulten EA, Shaw LJ, Goyal M, Dunning A, Achenbach S, et al. Prevalence and severity of Coronary artery disease and adverse events among symptomatic patients with coronary arterycalcification scores of zero. Undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography. Results from theCONFIRM (coronary CT angiography evaluation for clinical outcomes: an international multicenterregistry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:2533-40.

  17. Koskinas KC, Feldman CL, Chatzizisis YS, Coskun AU, Jonas M, Maynard C, Baker AB, Papafaklis MI, Edelman ER, Stone PH. Natural history of experimental coronary atherosclerosis and vascular remodeling in relation to endothelial shear stress: a serial, in vivo intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation.2010;121:2092– 101.

  18. Russo V, Zavalloni A, Reggiani MLB, Buttazzi K, Valentina Gostoli, Bartolini S. Incremental prognosticvalue of coronary CT angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3;351-9.

  19. AmbroseJA,Srikanth S.C.Computed tomographic angiography for localizing the site of plaquedisruption/thrombus. Is detection so complex?.Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4:82-4.

  20. Achenbach S, Marwan M, Ropers D, Schepis T, Pfiderer T, Anders K, et al. Coronary computedtomography with consistent dose below 1 mSv using prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition. Eur Heart J.2010;31:340-6.

  21. Roger VI, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, Benjamin EJ, Berry JD, Borden WB et al, Heart disease and stroke statistics--2012 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation.2012;125:e2-e220

  22. Llerena-Rojas LR, Peix-González A, Valiente-Mustelier J. Técnicas de imagen no invasivas en lavaloración y la prevención de la enfermedad Coronaria. Rev Esp Cardiol Supl. 2011;11(E):36-44.

  23. Goderie TPM, van Soest G, García-García HM, Koljenovic S, van Leenders GJLH, Mastic F, et al.Combined optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound radio frequency data analysis forplaque characterization. Classification accuracy of human coronary plaques in vitro. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;26:843-50.

  24. Madder RD, Chinnaiyan KM, Marandici AM, Goldstein JA. Features of disrupted plaques by coronarycomputed tomographic angiography correlates with invasively proven complex lesions. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4:105- 113.

  25. Naghavi M, Falk E. From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient. Asymptomatic Atherosclerosis: Pathophysiology, Detection and Treatment. Contemporary Cardiology. LLC: Springer Science+ Business Media; 2010. p. 13-38.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Cubana Cardiol Cir Cardiovasc. 2013;19