medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Cubana de Cirugía

ISSN 1561-2945 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2012, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Revista Cubana de Cirugía 2012; 51 (4)

Non-videolaparoscopic minimal access technique to treat umbilical hernia with multiple midline defects

Abraham AJF, Cardoso LN, Molina FE, Sánchez SN, Ranero AV, Hernández GL
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 12
Page: 271-279
PDF size: 102.72 Kb.


Key words:

umbilical hernia, multiple defects, non-vide olaparoscopic minimal access.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: apreliminary study conducted by the author of this paper on relapsing umbilical hernia showed that the multiple midline defects may predispose a patient to it, if not treated at the same time. The present paper was aimed at demonstrating that the application of a non-videolaparoscopic technique manages to comprehensively cure the umbilical hernia and the multiple midline defects.
Methods: from 2006 through 2011, all the herniated patients (72) who went to the specialized service of “Calixto García” general university hospital and presented with umbilical hernia and midline defects such as dyasthasia or epigastric hernia were selected. An intervention study was conducted to demonstrate the advantages of the surgical technique registered by the author in the National Center of Copyright (CENDA) under the register no. 856-2007. Through a transumbilical incision, a preperitoneal polypropylene prosthesis that protects the affected area was placed. The complications and the level of satisfaction of the patient were evaluated
Results: males and patients with umbilical hernia and diasthasia prevailed, followed by cases with umbilical and epigastric hernia and finally the three defects together. The surgical time mean was 45 minutes. The predominant postoperative complication was serome, but there was no infection, rejection or death. The level of satisfaction was considered excellent in most of cases, and just one relapse.
Conclusions: this method is feasible and useful.


REFERENCES

  1. Ceccarelli G, Casciola L, Spaziani A, Bartoli A, Stefanoni M, Di Zitti L, et. al. Laparoscopic repair of incisional and umbilical hernias. Our experience G Chir. 2007 Nov-Dec;28(11-12):451-6.

  2. Ahmad S, Mufti TS, Zafar A, Akbar I. Conservative management of mesh site infection in ventral hernia repair.J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2007 OctDec;19(4):75-7.

  3. Gómez-Cordero R, Benjamín D, Ramírez Ordóñez C., Ovando E. Hernia umbilical con abordaje transumbilical: Una alternativa en la resolución quirúrgica. Cirujano General. 2007;29(3): 67-73.

  4. Grupo Nacional de Cirugía. Manual de procedimientos de diagnóstico y tratamiento en cirugía. 3ra.ed. Ciudad de La Habana: Pueblo y Educación; 1987. p. 221-8.

  5. Goderich J. Clasificación cubana de las hernias. Disponible en: http://www.sld.cu/galerias/pdf/uvs/cirured/clasificacion_hernias.pdf . Acceso: 10 de octubre de 2008.

  6. Abraham J, García A, Cruz A. Hernia umbilical y defectos congénitos de la línea media: En: García Gutiérrez A, Pardo Gómez G, editores. Cirugía. La Habana: Editorial Ciencias Médicas; 2007. p. 1510-7.

  7. Mayagoitia JC. Hernias de la pared abdominal. Tratamiento actual. México D.F: Editorial Alfil SA; 2009. p. 337-41.

  8. Terzi C. Antimicrobial prophylaxis in clean surgery with special focus on inguinal hernia repair with mesh. J Hosp Infect. 2006;Apr 62;(4):427-36.

  9. Abraham J. Cirugía de las hernias de la pared abdominal: La Habana: Editorial Ciencias Médicas; 2010. p. 478-84.

  10. Martin DF,

  11. Lau H, Patil NG. Umbilical hernia in adults. Surg Endosc. 2003 Dec;17(12):2016-20.

  12. Germanov G, Tsvetkov I, Radionov M, Pozharliev T.Laparoscopic repair of umbilical hernias-initial experience. Khirurgia (Sofia). 2006;(3):5-8.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Revista Cubana de Cirugía. 2012;51