medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista de Investigación Clínica

Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2008, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Invest Clin 2008; 60 (3)

Does circumcision has an effect on female’s perception of sexual satisfaction?

Cortés-González JR, Arratia-Maqueo JA, Gómez-Guerra LS
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 8
Page: 227-230
PDF size: 44.96 Kb.


Key words:

Female sexual satisfaction, Circumcision, Orgasm, Prepuce, Vaginal lubrication.

ABSTRACT

Objective. To evaluate sexual satisfaction on women who have experienced sexual intercourse with the same partner on non-circumcised and circumcised states. Material and methods. A total of 19 women between 19 and 53 y/o, median age 30, in which their sexual partner was programmed for circumcision were included in this study. The survey was a validated version on the Changes on Sexual Functioning Questionnaire (CSFQ). General sexual satisfaction, pain during vaginal penetration, desire, vaginal orgasm, vaginal lubrication, sexual frequency changes in oral and/ or anal sexual activities and esthetical perception on circumcised penis were surveyed before the procedure and 2 months after. Results. Changes on Vaginal lubrication during intercourse were significant (p = 0.004), it diminished from 78% to 63%. There were no statistically significant differences on general sexual satisfaction, pain during vaginal penetration, desire, vaginal orgasm. Conclusions. Circumcision has either negative or positive effect on female’s partner perception of sexual satisfaction.


REFERENCES

  1. O’hara K, O’hara J. The effect of male circumcision on the sexual enjoyment of the female partner Bju International. Vol. 83. Suppl. 1. 1999, p. 79-84,

  2. Learman LA. Neonatal circumcision: a dispassionate analysis. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1999; 42: 849.

  3. Masters WH, Johnson VE. Human sexual response. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.; 1966, p. 189.

  4. Diddle AW. Should circumcision be done routinely? Med Aspects Hum Sexual 1967; 1: 32.

  5. Castañeda Sánchez O, Flores García E, López del Castillo Sánchez D, Cortés Gil H. Anorgasmy prevalence in women attended at Familiar Medicine Unit no. 1 in Obregon, Sonora, Mexico. Ginecol Obstet Mex 2005; 73(10): 525-30.

  6. Bensley G, Boyle G. Effects of male circumcision on female arousal and orgasm. New Zealand Medical Journal 2003; 116(1181): 595-6.

  7. Bobes J, Gonzalez MP, Rico-Villandemoros F, Bascaran MT, Sarasa P, Clayton A. Validation of the spanish version of the changes in sexual functioning questionnaire (CSFQ). Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy 2000; 26: 119-31.

  8. Fink K, Carson C, Devellis R. Adult Circumcision Outcomes Study: effect on erectile function, penile sensitivity, sexual activity and satisfaction. J Urol 2002; 167: 2113-16.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Invest Clin. 2008;60