medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista de Investigación Clínica

Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2010, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Invest Clin 2010; 62 (3)

Right and left partial iatrogenic injuries of the biliary tree. Therapeutic options

Mercado MÁ, Domínguez I, Arriola JC, Ramirez-Del Val F, Urencio M, Sánchez-Fernández N
Full text How to cite this article

Language: English
References: 19
Page: 214-221
PDF size: 100.17 Kb.


Key words:

Biliary injury, Hepatojejunostomy, Roux en Y, Bile duct injuries.

ABSTRACT

Background. Bile duct injuries (BDI) have a wide array of presentation. Left partial injuries (Strasberg D) of the hepatic duct are the result of excessive traction, which dissects the hepatic hilum and provokes medial perforations without continuity loss. Right partial injuries (Strasberg A, B and C) are produced by direct damage to the hepatic duct or isolated injury to the right and accessory ducts. It is important to determine frequency, spectrum and treatment outcome of this BDI in the surgical scenario. Methods. Patients with BDI who underwent surgical treatment in our hospital were reviewed, right and left partial injuries were selected. Demographic, clinical and therapeutic data were analyzed. Results. In a 16- year period, 405 patients underwent surgical treatment of BDI. 31 (8%) were classified as a left partial injury (Strasberg D): 23 injuries at the common hepatic duct treated with a Hepatojejunostomy (HJ); four at the confluence level which received a HJ with neoconfluence construction; two partial injuries in the left hepatic duct underwent a selective left HJ; and two complete occlusions of the left hepatic duct, one treated with a partial hepatectomy and the last case underwent a partial HJ. Right partial injuries (Strasberg A, B or C) were identified in 21 cases (5%), their treatment was tailored according to the type of BDI (conservative, selective HJ, or hepatectomy). Conclusions. In our series the frequency of left and right partial BDI injuries was 8% and 5%, respectively. The spectrum of analyzed injuries included four subtypes for the left partial and eight for the right partial lesions. Most BDI in the two analyzed groups presented concomitant devascularization of the extra-hepatic ducts, therefore receiving surgical treatment rather than endoscopic treatment was done.


REFERENCES

  1. Karvonen J, et al. Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: primary and long-term results from a single institution. Surg Endosc 2007; 21(7): 1069-73.

  2. Bujanda L, et al. MRCP in the diagnosis of iatrogenic bile duct injury. NMR Biomed 2003; 16(8): 475-8.

  3. Bergman JJ, et al. Treatment of bile duct lesions after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Gut 1996; 38(1): 141-7.

  4. Mercado MA, et al. Acute bile duct injury. The need for a high repair. Surg Endosc 2003; 17(9): 1351-5.

  5. Flum DR, et al. Bile duct injury during cholecystectomy and survival in medicare beneficiaries. Jama 2003; 290(16): 2168-73.

  6. Chapman WC, et al. Bile duct injuries 12 years after the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2003; 7(3): 412-6.

  7. Costamagna G, et al. Multidisciplinary approach to benign biliary strictures. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol 2007; 10(2): 90-101.

  8. Rauws EA, Gouma DJ. Endoscopic and surgical management of bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2004; 18(5): 829-46.

  9. Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ. An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 1995; 180(1): 101-25.

  10. Callery MP. Avoiding biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: technical considerations. Surg Endosc 2006; 20(11): 1654-8.

  11. Stewart L, Way LW. Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Factors that influence the results of treatment. Arch Surg 1995; 130(10): 1123-8. discussion 1129.

  12. Bismuth H. In: Bismuth H (ed.).Postoperative Strictures of the bile duct. The biliary Tract V. New York: Ed.Churchill. Livingstone; 1982, p. 209-18.

  13. Stewart L, et al. Right hepatic artery injury associated with laparoscopic bile duct injury: incidence, mechanism, and consequences. J Gastrointest Surg 2004; 8(5): 523-30, discussion 530-1.

  14. Mercado M, et al. Bile duct injuries related to misplacement of T tubes. Ann Hepatol 2006; 5: 44-8.

  15. Mercado MA, et al. Bile duct growing factor: an alternate technique for reconstruction of thin bile ducts after iatrogenic injury. J Gastrointest Surg 2006; 10(8): 1164-9.

  16. Mercado MA, et al. Voluntary and involuntary ligature of the bile duct in iatrogenic injuries: a nonadvisable approach. J Gastrointest Surg 2008; 12(6): 1029-32.

  17. Mercado MA, et al. Long-term evaluation of biliary reconstruction after partial resection of segments IV and V in iatrogenic injuries. J Gastrointest Surg 2006; 10(1): 77-82.

  18. Mercado MA. Early versus late repair of bile duct injuries. Surg Endosc 2006; 20(11): 1644-7.

  19. Strasberg SM, Picus DD, Drebin JA. Results of a new strategy for reconstruction of biliary injuries having an isolated rightsided component. J Gastrointest Surg 2001; 5(3): 266-74




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Invest Clin. 2010;62