2012, Number 4
<< Back Next >>
Arch Neurocien 2012; 17 (4)
Comparison of the work area and angle of attack in dealing orbitocigomatico versus orbitocigomatico modified (internal orbitocraneano transcigomatico)
Salgado-Camacho JM, Trujillo-Murillo KC, Reyes-Téllez GJ, Gómez-Amador JL, Bargés-Coll J
Language: Spanish
References: 22
Page: 215-220
PDF size: 172.39 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Objetive: ensure trat there is no change in the work area and angle of attack when camparing the orbitozygomatic
approach with respect to the variant proposed approach.
Material and methods: we performed in 15 human skulls
preserved with the technique of the Faculty of Medicine (UNAM) orbitozygomatic approach and the proposed variant
(internal orbitcranial transzygomatic), measurements were made of angle of attack and work area, we performed
the statistical analysis of the results.
Results: the work area remains unchanged in both approaches(orbitozygomatic
and variant), the angle of attack is greater in the orbitozygomatic approach with respect to the variant.
Conclusions:
the approach proposed variant (internal orbitocranial transzygomatic) does not change the work area but has a lower
angle of attack with respect to the clasical orbitozygomatic approach.
REFERENCES
Yasargil MG, Reichman MV, Kubik S. Preservation of the frontotemporal branch of the facial nerve using the interfascial temporalis flap for pterional craniotomy: technical article. J Neurosurg 1987;67:463-6.
Hakuba A, Liu S, Nishimura S. The orbitozygomatic infratemporal approach: a new surgical technique. Surg Neurol 1986;26:271-6.
Jane JA, Park TS, Pobereskin LH, Winn HR, Butler AB. The supraorbital approach. Technical note. Neurosurgery 1982; 11:537-42.
Pellerin P, Lesoin F, Dhellemes P, Donazzam M, Jomin M. Usefulness of the orbitofrontomalar approach associated with bone reconstruction for frontotemporosphenoid meningiomas. Neurosurgery 1984;15:715-8.
Abdel Aziz KM, Froelich SC, Cohen PL, Sanan A, Keller JT, van Loveren HR. The one-piece orbitozygomatic approach: the MacCarty burr hole and the inferior orbital fissure as keys to technique andapplication. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2002;144: 15-24.
Al-Mefty O. Supraorbital-pterional approach to skull base lesions. Neurosurgery 1987;21:474-7.
Hayashi N, Hirashima Y, Kurimoto M, Asahi T, Tomita T, Endo S. One-piece pedunculated frontotemporal orbitozygomatic craniotomy by creation of a subperiosteal tunnel beneath the temporal muscle: technical note. Neurosurgery 2002;51: 1520-4.
Shigeno T, Tanaka J, Atsuchi M. Orbitozygomatic approach by transposition of temporalis muscle and one-piece osteotomy. Surg Neurol 1999;52:81-3.
Zabramski JM, Kiris T, Sankhla SK, Cabiol J, Spetzler RF. Orbitozygomatic craniotomy. Technical note. J Neurosurg 1998; 89:336-41.
Delashaw JB Jr, Tedeschi H, Rhoton AL Jr. Modified supraorbital craniotomy. Technical note. Neurosurgery 1992;30:954-6.
Pellerin P, Lesoin F, Dhellemes P, Donazzam M, Jomin M. Usefulness of the orbitofrontomalar approach associated with bone reconstruction for frontotemporosphenoid meningiomas. Neurosurgery 1984;15:715-8.
Pontius AT, Ducic Y. Extended orbitozygomatic approach to the skull base to improve access to the cavernous sinus and optic chiasm. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;130:519-25.
Sindou M, Alaywan M. La dépose orbitaire et/ou zygomatique dans l’abord des lésions proches de la base du crane. Technique chirurgicale, étude anatomique et analyse d’une série de 24 cas. Neurochirurgie 1990;36:225-33.
Campero A, Martins C, Socolovsy M, Yasuda A, Dimitrovic L, Torino R. Abordaje orbitocigomático en tres piezas. Nota técnica. Rev Argent Neuroc 2008;22:75-9.
Sindou M, Emery E, Acevedo G, Ben-David U. Respective indications for orbital rim, zygomatic arch and orbito-zygomatic osteotomies in the surgical approach to central skull base lesions. Critical, retrospective review in 146 cases. Act Neurochir (Wien) 2001;143:967-75.
Wanibuchi M. Preauricular transzygomatic approach to the anterior infratemporal fossa and middle infratemporal fosa. In: Fukushima T: Photo atlas of skull base dissection. New York, Thieme 2009;166-206.
Gonzalez LF, Crawford NR, Horgan M. Working area and angle attack in three cranial base approaches: pterional, orbitozygomatic, and maxillar y extensión of the orbitozygomatic approach. Neurosurgery 50;(3):550-7.
Youssef AS, Willard L, Downes A. The frontotemporalorbitozygomatic approach: reconstructive technique and outcome. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2012;154(7):1275-83.
Seçkin H, Avci E, Uluç K. The work horse of skull base surgery: orbitozygomatic approach. Technique, modifications, and applications. Neurosurg Focus 2008;25(6):E4.
Campero A, Mar tins C, Socolovsky M. Three-Piece Orbitozygomatic Approach. Operative Neurosurgery 2010;66: E119.
Guinto G. Cirugía de la base del cráneo. ¿Hasta dónde y hasta cuándo?. Rev Med Clin 2008;19(5):610-6.
Mariniello G, Maiuri F, de Divitiis E, et al. Lateral orbitotomy for removal of sphenoid wing meningiomas invading the orbit. Neurosurgery 2010; 66 (6 Suppl Operative): 287-92.