medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Médica MD

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2013, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Med MD 2013; 4.5 (3)

Ophthalmologic findings in shaken baby syndrome

Delgado-Pelayo S, Delgado-Pelayo RM
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 24
Page: 181-185
PDF size: 580.33 Kb.


Key words:

retinal hemorrhages, shaken baby syndrome, subdural hematoma.

ABSTRACT

The shaken baby syndrome (SBS) is a severe form of physical abuse with multiple repercussions, the babies and kids are especially vulnerable to violent shakes, representing an important cause of death within this age group. It is of great importance the early diagnosis to avoid posterior sequels. One of the clinical manifestations of great use are the ophthalmological alterations leading to the diagnose of SBS, such as retinal hemorrhages, retinal folds, vitreous hemorrhages, retinoschisis, papilledema, optical nerve sheath hemorrhages. Said findings are observed through ophthalmoscopy under mydriasis and should describe accordingly to the number, type or pattern of hemorrhage distribution, since this has a diagnosis and prognosis implication; correlated with the intracranial abnormalities severity. The latter, should be complemented with the clinical scene, including the intentional search for additional fractures, lesions on intra-abdominal level and subdural hematoma. A variety of conditions may result in retinal hemorrhages on lacting infants or young kids, reason why they should be known to perform a proper differential diagnosis. Young kids with ophthalmological findings of cranial-encephalic trauma (CET) require a regular follow-up by an ophthalmologist. The visual potential on kids with CET is limited by the lesions on the central nervous system and the retinal lesions.


REFERENCES

  1. Loredo A, Trejo J, Melquíades I. Síndrome del niño sacudido. Forma extrema del abuso físico infantil. Acta Pediatr Mex 2011;32:177-179.

  2. 2.Muna AS, Ibtisam BE, Anuradha G. Shaken Baby Syndrome as a Form of Abusive Head Trauma. SQU Med J 2011; 11:322-327

  3. 3.Christian CW, Block R. Abusive head trauma in infant sand children. Pediatrics. 2009 May;123(5):1409-11.

  4. 4.King WJ, MacKay M, Sirnick A; Canadian Shaken Baby Study Group. Shaken baby syndrome in Canada: clinical characteristics and outcomes of hospital cases. CMAJ 2003; 168:155-9.

  5. 5.Bhardwaj G, Chowdhury V, Jacobs MB, et al. A systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of ocular signs in pediatric abusive head trauma. Ophthalmology 2010; 117:983.

  6. 6.Kivlin JD. A 12-year ophthalmologic experience with the shaken baby syndrome at a regional children's hospital. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1999; 97:545.

  7. 7.Zozaya B. Alteraciones oculares en el síndrome del niño maltratado. Revista Cubana de Pediatría 2011;83(1):117-119.

  8. 8.Levin AV. Ophthalmology of shaken baby syndrome. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2002; 13:201.

  9. 9.Binenbaum G, Mirza-George N, Christian CW, Forbes BJ. Odds of abuse associated with retinal hemorrhages in children suspected of child abuse. J AAPOS 2009; 13:268.

  10. 10.Aryan HE, Ghosheh FR, Jandial R, Levy ML. Retinal hemorrhage and pediatric brain injury: etiology and review of the literature. J Clin Neurosci 2005; 12:624.

  11. 11.Morad Y, Kim YM, Armstrong DC, et al. Correlation between retinal abnormalities and intracranial abnormalities in the shaken baby syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol 2002; 134:354.

  12. 12.Kivlin JD, Simons KB, Lazoritz S, Ruttum MS. Shaken baby syndrome. Ophthalmology 2000; 107:1246.

  13. 13.Kapoor S, Schiffman J, Tang R, et al. The significance of white-centered retinal hemorrhages in the shaken baby syndrome. Pediatr Emerg Care 1997; 13:183.

  14. 14.McCabe CF, Donahue SP. Prognostic indicators for vision and mortality in shaken baby syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol 2000; 118:373.

  15. 15.Mills M. Funduscopic lesions associated with mortality in shaken baby syndrome. J AAPOS 1998; 2:67.

  16. 16.Massicotte SJ, Folberg R, Torczynski E, et al. Vitreoretinal traction and perimacular retinal folds in the eyes of deliberately traumatized children. Ophthalmology 1991; 98:1124.

  17. 17.Gaynon MW, Koh K, Marmor MF, Frankel LR. Retinal folds in the shaken baby syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol 1988; 106:423.

  18. 18.Marshall DH, Brownstein S, Dorey MW, et al. The spectrum of postmortem ocular findings in victims of shaken baby syndrome. Can J Ophthalmol 2001; 36:377.

  19. 19.Gnanaraj L, Gilliland MG, Yahya RR, et al. Ocular manifestations of crush head injury in children. Eye (Lond) 2007; 21:5.

  20. 20.Duhaime AC, Alario AJ, Lewander WJ, et al. Head injury in very young children: mechanisms, injury types, and ophthalmologic findings in 100 hospitalized patients younger than 2 years of age. Pediatrics 1992; 90:179.

  21. 21.Jenny C, Hymel KP, Ritzen A, et al. Analysis of missed cases of abusive head trauma. JAMA 1999; 281:621.

  22. 22.Togioka BM, Arnold MA, Bathurst MA, et al. Retinal hemorrhages and shaken baby syndrome: an evidence-based review. J Emerg Med 2009; 37:98.

  23. 23.Matthews GP, Das A. Dense vitreous hemorrhages predict poor visual and neurological prognosis in infants with shaken baby syndrome. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1996; 33:260.

  24. 24.Levin AV. Retinal Hemorrhages: Advances in Understanding. Pediatr Clin N Am 2009; 333–334N Am 2009; 333–3448-263.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Med MD. 2013;4.5