medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Médica Sur

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2012, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Med Sur 2012; 19 (2)

Reynaud’s phenomenon secondary to Diffuse Scleroderma

Carrillo-Esper R, Ramírez-Hinojosa JP, Lázaro-Rosales ES
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 11
Page: 111-115
PDF size: 88.71 Kb.


Key words:

Raynaud’s phenomenon, Systemic sclerosis, Vasoconstriction, Ischemia.

ABSTRACT

Raynaud’s phenomenon (RP) affects 3-5% of the population, which may be primary or secondary to underlying disease. It is characterized by sudden transient and recurrent episodes of pallor and/or digital cyanosis. Connective tissue disease, particularly systemic sclerosis, is the main causes of the RP. In the RP there is imbalance between vasoconstricting and vasodilating factors. Physical examination nailfold capillaroscopy and immunological test can differentiate primary from secondary RP. Mild RP can be managed with conservative non-pharmacological lifestyle modifications. In the severe RP vasodilator treatment is needed. In refractory cases with critical digital ischemia, intravenous treatment with prostaglandin analogues and surgery are useful.


REFERENCES

  1. Steen V. The many faces of scleroderma. Rheum Dis Clin N Am 2008; 34: 1-15.

  2. Gayraud M. Raynaud’s phenomenon. Joint Bone Spine 2007; 74: 1-8.

  3. García CM, Jimenez HM, Escárcega R, Mendoza PC, Pardo SR, Galarza MC, et al. Treatment of Raynaud’s phenomenon. Autoimmunity Reviews 2008; 8: 62-8.

  4. Herrick A. Pathogenesis of Raynaud’s phenomenon. Rheumatology 2005; 44: 587-96.

  5. Baumhäkel M, Böhm M. Recent achievements in the management of Raynaud’s phenomenon. Vasc Health Risk Manag 2010; 6: 207-14.

  6. Flavahan A. Regulation of vascular reactivity in scleroderma: New insights into Raynaud’s Phenomenon. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2008; 34: 81-7.

  7. Cutolo M, Sulli A, Secchi ME, Paolino S, Pizzorni C. Nailfold capillaroscopy is useful for the diagnosis and follow-up of autoimmune rheumatic diseases. A future tool for the analysis of microvascular heart involvement? Rheumatology 2006; 45: 43-6.

  8. Huisstede R, Hoogvliet C. Effectiveness of Interventions for Secondary Raynaud’s Phenomenon: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011; 92: 32-8.

  9. Thompson A, Pope E. Calcium channel blockers for primary Raynaud’s phenomenon: a meta-analysis. Rheumatology 2005; 44: 145-50.

  10. Riemekasten G, Sunderkötter C. Vasoactive therapies in systemic sclerosis. Rheumatology 2006; 45: 49-51.

  11. Kotsis S, Chung K. A systematic review of the outcomes of digital sympathectomy for treatment of chronic digital ischemia. J Rheumatol 2003; 30: 1788-92.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Med Sur. 2012;19