medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista del Centro Dermatológico Pascua

ISSN 1405-1710 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2000, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cent Dermatol Pascua 2000; 9 (1)

Open, comparative and prospective study between the combination betamethasone 0.25 mg/loratadine 5 mg tablets and malate of chlorpheniramine 8 mg pills of lingering liberation, in patient with moderate acute urticaria to severe

de Alba AL, Elizondo RA, Sánchez RP
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 8
Page: 43-48
PDF size: 180.67 Kb.


Key words:

Acute urticaria, chlorpheniramine, betamethasone, loratadine.

ABSTRACT

This was an open, comparative and prospective study designed to compare the efficacy and safety of the combination of betamethasone 0.25 mg/loratadine 5 mg tablets with chlorpheniramine maleate 8 mg extended release tablets in the treatment of clinical manifestations of moderate to severe acute urticaria. Fifty-four patients were included within two centers, finishing 51; 24 in the betamethasone/loratadine group and 27 in the chlorpheniramine group. The dosage regimen for each group, was one tablet every twelve hours during five days. Efficacy was assessed on third and fifth days on the basis of decreased of the urticarial lesions, latency, decreased of the pruritus and the patient and physician’s global evaluation of improvement. Safety was assessed through a questionnaire and on the adverse effects report. The results confirm the effectiveness of both treatments for the initial management of acute urticaria, in which the shorter latency for the betamethasone/loratadine group provided a clinical advantadge over the chlorpheniramine treatment. The adverse events were similar for both groups.


REFERENCES

  1. Monroe E, Fox R, Green A et al. Efficacy and safety of loratadine (10 mg once daily) in the management of idiopathic chronic urticaria. J Am Acad Dermatol 1988; 19: 138-139.

  2. Clissold S, Sorkin E, Goa K. Loratadine. A preliminary review of its pharmacodynamic properties and therapeutic efficacy. Drugs 1989; 37: 42-57.

  3. Monroe E. Relative efficacy and safety of loratadine, hydroxyzine, and placebo in chronic idiopathic urticaria and atopic dermatitis. Clin Ther 1992; 14: 17-21.

  4. Langeland T, Fagertun H, Larsen S. Therapeutic effect on pruritus in patients with atopic dermatitis. Allergy 1994; 49: 22-26.

  5. Guerra L, Vicenzi C, Marchesi E et al. Loratadine and cetirizine in the treatment of chronic urticaria. Eur Acad Dermatol and Venereol 1994; 3: 148-152.

  6. Monroe E. Safety and efficay of loratadine in urticaria. Int J Dermatol 1996; 35: 837-842.

  7. Monroe E. Loratadine in the treatment of urticaria. Clin Ther 1997; 19: 232-242.

  8. Slater J, Zechnich A, Haxby D. Second-Generation Antihistamines. Drugs 1999; 57: 31-47.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Cent Dermatol Pascua. 2000;9