medigraphic.com
ISSN 1665-2576 (Print)

2013, Number S1

<< Back

Rev Mex Cir Endoscop 2013; 14 (S1)

Pedagogical revolution in surgery, Parte IV. Results measuring

Quirarte CC, Muñoz HJD

Language: Spanish
References: 20
Page: 52-60
PDF size: 192.13 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Fourth part: General concepts of scientific research methodology and its importance in the measurement on results of education and skills acquisition.
This part outlines some concepts of interest to the teaching surgeon, such as the importance of research methodology on the physician’s professional, and on the educator´s «meta-professional» assets. The way in which the quantitative methods of evaluation turn data collection into numerical basis and the use of statistical analysis. Why quantitative statistical research results, translate as «test» or «evidence», which are precisely the foundations of «Evidence-Based-Medicine and Surgery». Some check-lists and standardized scales as measuring devices. What are the evaluation criteria constituents in the metrics of motor skills («Efficiency and quality»). Electronic recordkeeping systems in skills analysis. Basic concepts like «reliability», «validity» and «objectivity» of the tests. Types of validity. Statistical significance of reliability and validity in the quantitative analysis data and the existence of statistical software packages.


REFERENCES

  1. Gallagher AG, Ritter EM, Satava RM. Fundamental principles of validation and reliability: rigorous science for the assessment of surgical education and training. Surg Endosc 2003; 17: 1525-1529.

  2. Kohn TK, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. To err is human; building a safer health system. Citado por Choy I, Okrainec A. Simulation in Surgery: Perfecting the Practice. Surg Clin N Am 2010; 90: 457-473.

  3. Way LW, Stewart L, Grantert W, Liu K, Lee CR, Whang K et al. JG. Causes and prevention of laparoscopic bile injuries: analysis of 252 cases from a human factors and cognitive pschology perspective. Ann Surg 2003; 237: 460-469.

  4. Etchells E, O’Neill C, Bernstein M. Patient safety in surgery: error detection and prevention. World J Surg 2003; 27: 936-942.

  5. Lifshitz A. El significado actual de “Primum non nocere”. Seminario. El Ejercicio Actual de la Medicina. 2002. Disponible en: http://www.facmed.unam.mx/eventosseam2K1/2002/ponencia_jul_2k2.html

  6. Tajer CD. ¿Para qué necesita un médico conocer metodología de la investigación? IntraMed [En línea] [2 de abril de 2010]. Disponible en: http://www.intramed.net/contenidover.asp?contenidoID=64913

  7. Larios-Mendoza H. Seminario. El Ejercicio Actual de la Medicina. Competencia profesional y competencia clínica, 2006. Disponible en: http://www.facmed.unam.mx/eventos/seam2k1/2006/oct_01_ponencia.html

  8. García-García JA, González-Martínez JF, Estrada-Aguilar L, Uriega-González S. Educación médica basada en competencias. Rev Med Hosp Gen Mex 2010; 73: 57-69.

  9. Hernández-Sampieri CR, Fernández-Collado C, Baptista-Lucio P. Recolección de los datos cuantitativos. Metodología de la investigación. s.l. : McGraw-Hill Interamericana de México SA de CV, 1997; Vol. 9: 284-369.

  10. Boucourt-Rivera L. Su excelencia: la medicina basada en evidencias. ACIMED [En línea] [mayo-junio de 2003]. Disponible en: http:77scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?pid=S1024-94352003000300002&script=sci_arttext. ISSNJ 1561-2880

  11. Maier RV. What the surgeon of tomorrow needs to know about evidence-based surgery. Arch Surg 2006; 141: 317-323.

  12. Bann SD, Khan S, Darzi AW. Measurement of surgical dexterity using motion analysis of simple bench tasks. World J Surg 2003; 27: 390-394.

  13. Dubrowski A, Larmer JC, Leming JK, Brydges H, Carnahan HJ, Park A. Quantification of process measures in laparoscopic suturing. Surg Endosc 2006; 20: 1862-1866.

  14. Moorthy K, Munz Y, Sarker SK, Darzi A. Objective assessment of technical skills in surgery. BMJ 2003; 1: 1032-1037.

  15. Fried GM, Feldman LS. Objective assessment of technical performance. World J Surg [Revista on-line] 2008 [12 June 2007]; 32: 156-160.

  16. Martin JA, Regehr G, Reznik HR, McRae J, Murnahan C, Hutchinson M. An objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS) for surgical residents. Br. J. Surg. [Published online] 1997 [8 de diciembre de 2005]; 84: 273-278.

  17. Satava RM. Disruptive visions. Surgical Education. Surg Endosc 2004; 18: 779-781.

  18. Aggarwal R, Mytton OT, Derbrew M, Hananel D, Heydenburg M, Issenberg B et al. Training and simulation for patient safety. Dowloaded from quality safety.bmj.com. Qual Saf Health Care 2010; 19: 34-43.

  19. Grantcharov TP, Reznik RK. Teaching procedural skills. BMJ 2008; 336: 1129–1131.

  20. Dubrowski A, McRae H. Measurement of competence. In: Klein RV, editor. Minimally invasive surgery training: theories, method [Internet]. Washington: Department of Health & Human Services (US), Park A. Minimally Invasive Surgery Training: Methods and Outcomes. MIS online text. 2012; 2: 1-18.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com