medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Perinatología y Reproducción Humana

ISSN 0187-5337 (Print)
Instituto Nacional de Perinatología
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2013, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Perinatol Reprod Hum 2013; 27 (2)

Neonatal limits viability

Lozano-González CH, Flores-Tamez ME, Castro-Mejía S, Lozano-Flores JA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 13
Page: 79-85
PDF size: 467.65 Kb.


Key words:

Neonatal limits viability, extremely premature.

ABSTRACT

Background: Determine the limit of neonatal viability is desirable to avoid interventions that are costly, painful and unnecessary in the child who has no chance of survival. However, setting a threshold of viability is a major challenge because it is uncertain which extremely premature newborn may have a reasonable chance of survival. Methods: We collected information from 17,979 births in a four years period (2009-2012), studying all 71 infants born under 28 weeks gestation in a private Maternity Center of Monterrey, Nuevo León, México. Mainly focusing on the event occurrence and its outcome, including perinatal mortality rate, proportion of births occurrence at each gestational age, less than 28 weeks. Probability of death for each age was estimated, correlating death with age, gender and survival days. Results: From 17,979 live births only 0.39% (71) was less than 28 weeks gestation. Perinatal mortality rate for the studied period was 26.55 per 1,000 live births. There were a 2.88% of infants with 23 or less weeks. The probability of birth for each group age, less than 28 weeks is considered useful only for this population, and not to be regarded as a forecast for general application, since each gestational age sample is relatively small. The average life expectancy for babies 23 weeks of gestation was poor. There was a negative correlation for death and weight, not significant for gender and death, and positive for weight and days of life. Conclusions: While our study may be considered with limitations, it is based to serve the purposes of a well demographically defined population, and our result concurs with most guidelines and recommendations given in the international literature. We conclude that at 23 weeks gestation or less is fine to give palliative care. The limits of neonatal viability is not a birth weight or a certain gestational age, there are moral, ethical and humanitarian implications, decisions regarding procedures on extremely premature, should be supported by published consensus medically endorsed.


REFERENCES

  1. Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Critical care decisions in fetal and neonatal medicine. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics; 2006. Available: www.nuffieldbioethics.org

  2. Wilkinson AR, Ahluwalia J, Cole A, Crawford D, Fyle J, Gordon A. Management of babies born extremely premature at less than 26 weeks of gestation: a framework for clinical practice at the time of birth. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2009; 94: F2-F5.

  3. McCullough LB. Neonatal Ethics at the limits of viability. Pediatrics. 2005; 116: 1019-21.

  4. Microsoft Office Excel 2007, Microsoft Office Enterprice, 2007.

  5. Castañeda-Casale G, Márquez-González H, Rodríguez-Reyes ER. Mortalidad perinatal en un hospital de segundo nivel de atención. Rev Med IMSS. 2010; 48: 237-42.

  6. Rivera-Rueda MA, Hernández-Trejo M, Hernández-Peláez G, Llano-Rivas I, Di Castro-Stringher P, Illescas-Medrano E et al. Análisis de la mortalidad neonatal precoz en el Instituto Nacional de Perinatología (1999-2001). Perinatol Reprod Hum. 2005; 19: 13-21.

  7. Seaton SE, King S, Manktelow BN, Draper ES, Field DJ. Babies born at the threshold of viability: changes in survival and workload over 20 years. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2013; 98: F15-F20.

  8. House of Representatives H.R. 2175. Born Alive Infants Protection Act of 2001-2002, 107th Congress. Available: www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-107hr2175/pdt/BILLS-07hr2175rh.pdf"www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-107hr2175/pdt/BILLS-07hr2175rh.pdf. Fecha de consulta 17 de noviembre de 2012.

  9. Batton DG. Committe on Fetus and Newborn. Clinical report. Antenatal counseling regarding resuscitation at an extremely low gestational age. Pediatrics. 2009; 124: 422-7.

  10. Hansard J. Time limit for abortion. House of Commons Debates. 2008: 116: 476.

  11. Neonatal Resucitation Program Steering Committee.Born-Alive Infants Protection. Act of 2001. American Academy of Pediatrics Public Law 107-207. Available: www2.aap.org/nrp/inst_resources-bornalive-act.html

  12. Seri I, Evans J. Limits of viability: definition of the gray zone. J Perinatol. 2008; 28: S4-S8.

  13. Brody H. From an ethics of rationing to an ethics of waste avoidance. N Engl J Med. 366; 21: 1949-51.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Perinatol Reprod Hum. 2013;27