medigraphic.com
ISSN 1029-3035 (Electronic)

2013, Number S1

<< Back Next >>

Mediciego 2013; 19 (S1)

Computerized Axial Tomography of didelphic uterus. A case report

Betancourt CPO, López SJC, Companioni CIC

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page:
PDF size: 152.25 Kb.


ABSTRACT

This case is given by its little prevailed. Didelphic uterus is a congenital malformation, is the result of an abnormal development of Mullerian duct during the embryogenesis. These are the following symptoms: amenorrhea, infertility, lost of pregnancies, and others. Feminine patient of 24 years, with health antecedents, obstetrical history G-0, P-0 A-0, that goes to the doctor in several occasions for presenting pain in lower abdomen and menorrhagia; to the physical examination doctor found a mass at right iliac fossa, level a simple and contrasted of pelvis TAC was carried out where it was diagnosed as double uterus; this method was not the ideal for the diagnosis of this entity, but there are others more innocuous and with better accessibility such as the diagnostic ultrasound, hysterosalpingography, images by magnetic resonance, although this last one do not exist in the province.


REFERENCES

  1. Berek JS. Ginecología de Novack. México: McGraw Hill; 2004.

  2. Cabero Roura L, Cabrillo Rodríguez E, Bajo Arenas J. Tratado de Ginecología y Obstetricia. Madrid: Editorial Panamericana; 2013.

  3. Imaging of müllerian duct anomalies. Radiographics [Internet]. 2012 [citado 10 Ene 2013]; 32:6. Disponible en: http://radiographics.rsna.org/content/32/6/E233.full

  4. Usandizaga JA, de la Fuente P. Tratado de Obstetricia y Ginecología. Madrid: Interamericana; 2005.

  5. Troiano RN, McCarthy SM. Müllerian duct anomalies: imaging and clinical issues. Radiology [Internet]. 2004 [citado 10 Ene 2013]; 233:19-34. Disponible en: http://radiology.rsna.org/content/233/1/19.short

  6. Chan YY, Jayaprakasan K, Zamora J, Thornton JG, Raine-Fenning N, Coomarasamy A. The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update [Internet]. 2011 [citado 10 Ene 2013]. 17(6): 761- 771. Disponible en: http://humupd.oxfordjournals.org/content/17/6/761.full

  7. Pfeifer SM, García Roig F. Ginecología y Obstetricia. Barcelona: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009.

  8. Bocca SM, Abuhamad AZ. Use of 3-dimensional sonography to assess uterine anomalies. J Ultrasound Med [Internet]. 2013 [citado 20 Feb 2013]; 32(1):1-6. Disponible en: http://www.jultrasoundmed.org/content/32/1/1.full

  9. Liwenthal H. Uterus didelphys with a pregnancy in each horn case report. Br J Gynecol. 84:155, 2006.

  10. González Merlo J. Ginecología. La Habana: ECIMED; 2007.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com